Connect with us


African countries in danger because of the rating agencies

Having lost operational space in the US and Europe, the rating agencies have “thrown themselves” against emerging countries, particularly those in Africa. It is not necessary to have analytical skills to imagine the economic difficulties in a world devastated by the COVID-19. Especially in the emerging countries, which have always been susceptible to what happens in advanced economies.



This picture represent the current economic crisis.

At slightly different times and in slightly different ways, the three important rating agencies, Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s and Fitch, downgraded 10 African countries and their public debt securities to the level of junk, junk bonds. These are Angola, Botswana, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Democratic Republic of Congo, Gabon, Nigeria, South Africa, Mauritius, and Zambia.

The assessments are basically based on forecasts of the weakness of the tax and health systems of these countries. That is done while the World Bank has appropriately supported the suspension of interest payments on the debts of the poorest countries that are part of the International Development Association (IDA). On the other hand, their knowledge of Africa is very low. The S&P, for example, prides itself on being able to assess as many as 128 countries around the world. However, it has only one office, in Johannesburg, for the entire African continent.

If you want to find out more about the importance of the rating agencies and how they can influence the markets, download the Born2Invest mobile app. Read the latest economic news in the world and find out everything that matters to you.

The rating agencies have a huge role to play from an economic perspective

The ratings of the agencies are usually more or less trivial. However, they are taken into account by the markets to judge the health of the various economies and, consequently, to define the interest rates of the public debt of individual countries. This is a phenomenon that has been experienced many times, with devastating effects both on the increase in the cost of loans and on international investors.

In this regard, it is worth mentioning the role played by agencies in the financial meltdown in the years of the Great Crisis of 2008, which had an impact on global markets and, above all, on the real economy of many countries, including developing countries.

Since it seems that this is not in the collective memory, it is useful to recall the institutional complaints made against them. For example, the detailed report “The financial crisis inquiry report” prepared by a bipartisan Commission and published by the US Government in 2011. It stated, among other things, that “the crisis could not have happened without these agencies. Their ratings, first skyrocketing and then sharply downgraded, have sent markets and companies into turmoil.”

A few years ago, even the German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble said: ‘We must break the oligopoly of the rating agencies.’ Remember that in several circumstances, both the G8 and the G20 have produced a copious amount of literature, made up of documents and statements, which stigmatizes their behavior and calls for their profound reform.

Several countries in Africa were downgraded by the rating agencies

Moody’s has downgraded South Africa to junk, making it lose the last step of investment grade, under which institutional investors are no longer allowed to buy government bonds. It has estimated a significant increase in South Africa’s public debt to reach 91% of GDP by 2023. This year growth is expected to be less than 1% and then plunge into negative ground at minus 5.8%. Moody’s did not even wait to verify the economic impact of the coronavirus and the measures taken by the government in Pretoria.

The other two agencies had already rated South African stocks as junk for three years. Now South Africa will have to leave the important World Government Bond Index where all the government bonds with investment grade ratings are. As a result, the value of the securities will be redefined without a safety net.

Fitch has cut Gabon’s sovereign rating from B to CCC. The explanation for the downgrade concerns the possible difficulty in repaying sovereign debt due to lack of liquidity caused by the fall in oil prices.

Moody’s downgraded Mauritius’ sovereign rating due to the forecast of lower tourism earnings because of the coronavirus pandemic. Nigeria has been downgraded by S&P to B – because the COVID-19 would increase the risk of tax shocks resulting from lower oil prices and economic recession.

S&P also downgraded Botswana, one of the most stable economies in Africa, which had an A rating. The agency cited the weakening of the state budget due to a drop in demand for raw materials and the expected economic deceleration caused by the pandemic. Botswana was downgraded when not a single case of infection had been reported in the country.

The African Union should create its own supervisory authority over the activities of the agencies

These trash-level downgrades are causing serious problems, which can have worse consequences than the coronavirus itself. They reduce the value of sovereign bonds used as collateral in central bank financing operations, while at the same time increasing the cost of interest and, therefore, of debt. As a result, there will also be a wave of downgrades of private companies.

The African countries are being called upon by many to design a collective response mechanism against the abuse of ratings. Among other things, the African Union should create its own supervisory authority over the activities of the agencies and set fair and realistic assessment standards. The governments and populations of the African continent are increasingly looking to Europe for support and for a model. Unfortunately, even on the issue of rating agencies, the European Union is still and inexplicably paralyzed.


(Featured image by stevepb via Pixabay)

DISCLAIMER: This article was written by a third party contributor and does not reflect the opinion of Born2Invest, its management, staff or its associates. Please review our disclaimer for more information.

This article may include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believe,” “project,” “estimate,” “become,” “plan,” “will,” and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks as well as uncertainties, including those discussed in the following cautionary statements and elsewhere in this article and on this site. Although the Company may believe that its expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, the actual results that the Company may achieve may differ materially from any forward-looking statements, which reflect the opinions of the management of the Company only as of the date hereof. Additionally, please make sure to read these important disclosures.

First published in Notizie Geopolitiche, a third-party contributor translated and adapted the article from the original. In case of discrepancy, the original will prevail.

Although we made reasonable efforts to provide accurate translations, some parts may be incorrect. Born2Invest assumes no responsibility for errors, omissions or ambiguities in the translations provided on this website. Any person or entity relying on translated content does so at their own risk. Born2Invest is not responsible for losses caused by such reliance on the accuracy or reliability of translated information. If you wish to report an error or inaccuracy in the translation, we encourage you to contact us.

Sharon Harris is a feminist and a part-time nomad. She reports about businesses primarily involved in tech, CBD, and crypto. She started her career as a product manager at a Silicon Valley startup but now enjoys a new life as a personal finance geek and writer. Her primary aim is to provide readers with a new perspective on the overlapping world of finance and technology.