Business
Art Lending: What It Is and Why It Doesn’t Work in Italy
Using artworks as collateral to access personal loans could invigorate young collectors. It’s a promising avenue to rejuvenate the contemporary art system. Yet, in Italy, there are many hurdles.
In recent years, the art and finance sectors globally have found a new way to collaborate: art lending. Stripping away the fancy jargon, art lending allows owners of one or more art pieces to secure personal loans by using those artworks as collateral.
The Italian Context: Limited Demand for Art Lending
In Italy, perhaps predictably, art lending remains a scarcely practiced concept. The reasons for this tepid adoption may shed light on the dynamics of our art system and its demographics, both in terms of collectors and financial stakeholders.
Starting with collectors: It’s well-known that young collectors are few in Italy, and a significant portion of collectors operating in the country come from a higher socio-economic background. Practically speaking, this translates to dealing with an economically well-off demographic. Many of these collectors often don’t require loans. And if they do, they can pledge other assets as collateral. From an economic standpoint, there’s a lack of demand, especially considering the niche market to which art lending caters.
Art Lending Challenges on the Supply Side
On the supply side, our banking system doesn’t always have in-house experts skilled in art valuation. Without this expertise, it becomes challenging to authenticate the value of artworks used as collateral. This means our banks would need to hire new, specialized staff. The presence of mature or “senior” collectors also hampers the growth of credit institutions. Raised in a different era and society, today’s collectors have, over time, honed their collection management practices, meaning they rarely utilize banking services.
Seeking Solutions and A New Collector Demographic
This situation hinders the growth of the offering: a more dynamic market could encourage financial institutions to employ specialized staff and develop varied services catering to the art world. If the management of artworks and collections is primarily done independently by collectors, and considering many of these collectors have substantial income and assets, not only is there limited demand for art lending services, but also for other related and potential services.
Given our scenario, art lending faces challenges in becoming commonplace. It demands that banks possess the infrastructure to verify and certify the value of artworks used as collateral—a structural condition that represents a cost, which might be difficult to offset with other services and would be challenging to sustain.
A solution could be fostering a younger group of collectors, including those who aren’t wealthy. They might not afford five-figure artworks but can start their collection with emerging artists. Such a collector demographic would comprise individuals more likely to need personal loans, even for smaller amounts, and would often face challenges due to a lack of collateral.
The Potential Impact of Art Lending on Contemporary Art and Society
Moreover, promoting this kind of collecting could stimulate our contemporary art market, especially for budding artists, positively influencing artwork pricing. Lastly, it’s worth noting that expanding the emerging art market would not only enhance contemporary art awareness among Italians (who, let’s be frank, aren’t shining stars in this area) but also introduce a dynamic of bringing contemporary art closer to society. Through the known dialogue of supply and demand, artists (or styles) could emerge that better resonate with our society’s cultural needs.
This would be a noteworthy outcome: contemporary art that speaks to the general public, not just art connoisseurs, could result in fascinating cross-pollination. The key might be encouraging purchases by young individuals not yet into collecting. But it seems we stopped trying years ago.
__
(Featured image by Steve Johnson via Pexels)
DISCLAIMER: This article was written by a third party contributor and does not reflect the opinion of Born2Invest, its management, staff or its associates. Please review our disclaimer for more information.
This article may include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believe,” “project,” “estimate,” “become,” “plan,” “will,” and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks as well as uncertainties, including those discussed in the following cautionary statements and elsewhere in this article and on this site. Although the Company may believe that its expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, the actual results that the Company may achieve may differ materially from any forward-looking statements, which reflect the opinions of the management of the Company only as of the date hereof. Additionally, please make sure to read these important disclosures.
First published in Be Beez. A third-party contributor translated and adapted the article from the original. In case of discrepancy, the original will prevail.
Although we made reasonable efforts to provide accurate translations, some parts may be incorrect. Born2Invest assumes no responsibility for errors, omissions or ambiguities in the translations provided on this website. Any person or entity relying on translated content does so at their own risk. Born2Invest is not responsible for losses caused by such reliance on the accuracy or reliability of translated information. If you wish to report an error or inaccuracy in the translation, we encourage you to contact us.
-
Biotech1 week ago
Cogesa and Croma Gio.Batta Merge, Unlocking 15% Growth and Accelerating Investments
-
Cannabis2 days ago
Cannabis Companies Are Also Announcing Bitcoin Adoption
-
Fintech1 week ago
Crypto.com and Deutsche Bank: Pioneering the Future of Crypto Banking
-
Cannabis2 weeks ago
Berlin Sees 70% Drop in Cannabis-Related Crime After Legalization