Cannabis
Seven Years On: Canada’s Cannabis Boom Delivers Billions but Falls Short on Promises
Seven years after legalization, Canada has collected over CAD 5.4 billion in cannabis taxes, mostly benefiting provinces—Alberta leads per capita, while Quebec lags due to restrictive policies. Federal revenues fell short of forecasts, and only a fraction of promised education funding was spent. Despite strong tax intake, uneven gains and unmet commitments highlight persistent challenges.
It’s been seven years since cannabis was legalized. Canada is tallying its gains. The figures are impressive, but detailed data shows that not everything went according to plan. The federal government earned less than expected. Meanwhile, education spending turned out to be significantly lower than promised.
Since October 2018, Canada has collected a staggering amount from cannabis taxes, totaling over 5.4 billion Canadian dollars.
These data were released in response to a parliamentary inquiry. They provide one of the most accurate snapshots of the global cannabis market. They show who has benefited most from legalization and who has been left behind.
Canada’s provinces win the money race
Most of the money didn’t reach the central treasury in Ottawa (Canada’s capital). As much as $4.2 billion was taken by provincial governments.
Ontario took home the largest sum . It’s Canada’s most populous province, receiving $1.5 billion in cannabis sales. However, Ontario isn’t the real winner.
Alberta leads the way per capita
The biggest winner is Alberta . This province has three times the population of Ontario. Yet, it has generated just over a billion dollars in revenue from cannabis. On a per capita basis, the numbers are astonishing:
Alberta: $210 profit per person.
Northwest Territories: $135.80 per person.
Yukon: $126.35 per person.
Quebec at the tail end
At the other extreme is Quebec , where tax revenues were just $55.31 per capita
Why such a large difference? Quebec has adopted a very cautious sales model. The state has a monopoly on trade, and prices are strictly controlled. Reduced availability of stores and strict regulations have translated into lower budget revenues.
Cannabis Tax Canada
Officials in Ottawa had hoped for larger profits. The federal government received only $1.2 billion of the total .
The plans were more ambitious:
The 2018 budget assumed revenues of $690 million over the first 5 years. Reality has proven these plans ineffective. By 2023, only $567 million had been raised.
Cannabis producers have long warned the government that taxes are too high. The excise tax structure (a commodity tax) is destroying the profitability of legal businesses. As a result, the industry is growing more slowly than anticipated.
Promises vs. Reality: Where is the Money for Education?
The most controversial section of the report concerns prevention. The government promised to allocate a portion of marijuana profits to public education. It planned to spend $83 million on this over five years. What happened to that money?
Health Canada has spent just $21.6 million so far . That’s just a quarter of the promised amount.
What has spending looked like in each year?
Year 2018/2019: $13 million spent (over half of the total)
Pandemic years (2020-2022): Spending dropped to less than $500,000 per year.
Year 2024/2025: Spending slowly increases to $2.3 million.
Experts are sounding the alarm. Tax revenues are enormous, but the money isn’t returning to society in the form of educational programs.
Conclusions after seven years
Canada’s legalization experiment continues. It has generated billions in revenue for the government. However, it has shown that the market alone isn’t enough.
The distribution of funding is uneven. Some provinces are making a fortune, while others are losing money due to bureaucracy. More importantly, the government has forgotten its promises regarding education. Legalization is a process, and Canada is still learning from its mistakes.
__
(Featured image by 2H Media via Unsplash)
DISCLAIMER: This article was written by a third party contributor and does not reflect the opinion of Born2Invest, its management, staff or its associates. Please review our disclaimer for more information.
This article may include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believe,” “project,” “estimate,” “become,” “plan,” “will,” and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks as well as uncertainties, including those discussed in the following cautionary statements and elsewhere in this article and on this site. Although the Company may believe that its expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, the actual results that the Company may achieve may differ materially from any forward-looking statements, which reflect the opinions of the management of the Company only as of the date hereof. Additionally, please make sure to read these important disclosures.
First published in FaktyKonopne. A third-party contributor translated and adapted the article from the original. In case of discrepancy, the original will prevail.
Although we made reasonable efforts to provide accurate translations, some parts may be incorrect. Born2Invest assumes no responsibility for errors, omissions or ambiguities in the translations provided on this website. Any person or entity relying on translated content does so at their own risk. Born2Invest is not responsible for losses caused by such reliance on the accuracy or reliability of translated information. If you wish to report an error or inaccuracy in the translation, we encourage you to contact us.
-
Business1 week agoMarkets Whipsaw as Rate Fears and Bubble Risks Intensify
-
Crowdfunding3 hours agoOpstart Unifies Crowdlender: A Streamlined, Wallet-Free Investment Hub Launches December 2025
-
Cannabis1 week agoFirst Harvest in Schleswig-Holstein’s Cannabis Cooperatives Was distributed
-
Impact Investing2 weeks agoCarbon Markets: A Growing Pillar of Global Decarbonization and Financial Strategy



