Connect with us

Impact Investing

Global ESG Funds Suffer Record Outflows Amid Geopolitical and Regulatory Uncertainty

Global ESG funds saw $8.6 billion in net outflows in Q1 2025, reversing previous gains and marking Europe’s first quarterly outflow since 2018. U.S. and Asia also declined, while Canada and Australia remained resilient. Geopolitical tensions, U.S. policy shifts, and regulatory uncertainty hurt investor confidence, raising doubts about sustainable strategies’ viability and performance.

Published

on

esg

In the first quarter of 2025, the global ESG funds universe recorded net outflows of $8.6 billion, a record low that marked a sharp reversal from inflows of $18.1 billion in the previous quarter. This decline, recorded by Morningstar Sustainalytics, is particularly notable as it is the first time since 2018 that European sustainable funds have seen a quarter of net redemptions.

Investor confidence wanes as ESG funds face $8.6B in net outflows, driven by U.S. policy shifts, European regulatory challenges, and weak sector performance

European market withdrawals of $1.2 billion contrast with $20.4 billion in inflows in the fourth quarter of 2024. The United States recorded an even sharper decline, with sustainable funds recording their tenth consecutive quarter of outflows, reaching a total of $6.1 billion in just three months. Asia also lost momentum, with redemptions of $918 million, compared to inflows of $2.8 billion in the previous quarter.

The exception was Japan, which, while still recording outflows, saw an improvement compared to the previous quarter, with redemptions falling to less than $900 million from $1.1 billion in the previous quarter.

In stark contrast to these dynamics, smaller markets such as Canada and Australia/New Zealand have shown surprising resilience, recording net inflows of around $300 million each.

The survey also shows that the organic growth rate of the sustainable funds universe in the first quarter of 2025 fell to -0.27% , compared to +0.54% in the previous quarter. The difference appears even more marked when compared to the global funds universe, which showed positive growth of 0.90%, despite a general slowdown in flows, which went from $847 billion to $530 billion.

In this rather turbulent environment, BlackRock continues to maintain its leadership among global asset managers in the sustainable funds sector, with 403 billion dollars in assets under management in mutual funds and ETFs. UBS follows with 179 billion and Amundi with 178 billion.

The causes of ESG funds outflows

European investors’ confidence has been heavily affected by an increasingly uncertain geopolitical environment, further exacerbated by Donald Trump’s return to the US presidency. His openly hostile approach to climate issues and anti-ESG measures, including the well-known executive orders against DEI policies, have had a domino effect also beyond the US borders.

The resulting increase in legal risks has in fact pushed many US asset managers to adopt a more cautious line in promoting ESG strategies, generating hesitation among European investors and calling into question the idea of ​​a global alignment on climate goals.

Further complicating the European scenario is the internal regulatory evolution, which makes it increasingly difficult for operators to maintain a coherent ESG proposal. Finally, regulatory uncertainties are intertwined with the disappointing performance of some key sectors of the ecological transition, such as clean energy, fueling further doubts about the effectiveness of sustainable strategies.

__

(Featured image by Ibrahim Boran via Unsplash)

DISCLAIMER: This article was written by a third party contributor and does not reflect the opinion of Born2Invest, its management, staff or its associates. Please review our disclaimer for more information.

This article may include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believe,” “project,” “estimate,” “become,” “plan,” “will,” and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks as well as uncertainties, including those discussed in the following cautionary statements and elsewhere in this article and on this site. Although the Company may believe that its expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, the actual results that the Company may achieve may differ materially from any forward-looking statements, which reflect the opinions of the management of the Company only as of the date hereof. Additionally, please make sure to read these important disclosures.

First published in ESG NEWS. A third-party contributor translated and adapted the article from the original. In case of discrepancy, the original will prevail.

Although we made reasonable efforts to provide accurate translations, some parts may be incorrect. Born2Invest assumes no responsibility for errors, omissions or ambiguities in the translations provided on this website. Any person or entity relying on translated content does so at their own risk. Born2Invest is not responsible for losses caused by such reliance on the accuracy or reliability of translated information. If you wish to report an error or inaccuracy in the translation, we encourage you to contact us.

Jeremy Whannell loves writing about the great outdoors, business ventures and tech giants, cryptocurrencies, marijuana stocks, and other investment topics. His proficiency in internet culture rivals his obsession with artificial intelligence and gaming developments. A biker and nature enthusiast, he prefers working and writing out in the wild over an afternoon in a coffee shop.