Connect with us

Crowdfunding

Polytechnic Report Shows Substantial Growth in Equity Crowdfunded Companies

The Polytechnic synthesizes this data into an “issuer revaluation index.” The “Net asset value” for those who had ideally invested in all campaigns on CrowdFundMe grew by an average of 3.81 times: 249 points (versus 170 points for the market average). Among the main results, in fact, it shows that the compound annual growth rate (Cagr) of funded companies was 41 percent.

Published

on

CrowdFundMe has released a report produced in collaboration with students from the Milan Polytechnic, which analyzed the post-funding performance of startups and SMEs that have closed successful rounds on the portal (from founding through the end of 2021).

The study defined the most significant dynamics, from investment value trends to the quality of selection by the scouting team.

The very thorough analysis debunks a now rather widespread negative perception about Italian SMEs raising with equity crowdfunding.

Read more about the report on equity crowdfunding in Italy and find the most important business news of the day with the Born2invest mobile app.

Financial performance according to the Polytechnic report

Among the main results, in fact, it shows that the compound annual growth rate (Cagr) of funded companies was 41 percent. Both SMEs and Startups grow significantly in the years following the campaign, with a slight advantage for Startups, which have a CAGR of +47% versus +34% for SMEs.

Looking at profitability, a much higher percentage of SMEs than Startups record positive EBITDA even before the campaign on CrowdFundMe. Symmetrically, more than half of the Startups have yet to break even in both EBITDA and Profit.

Instead, it appears that companies are not accurate in their growth forecasts. In fact, the deviation between expected business plan turnover and actual turnover is at median values of -67 percent for the first year, -85 percent for the second, and -91 percent for the third. This is true for all sectors with the exception of Fintech and E-Commerce, which show initially positive, then negative but smaller deviations.

Post-campaign media coverage

In the years following the campaigns, the analyzed broadcasters gained visibility in major newspapers with an average value of around 2 articles.

The two most successful cases are in the Food sector, where Winelivery and Cesarine collected 9 and 8 prominent articles, respectively.

Only 31 companies in the sample did not receive mentions in newspapers, while there were no substantial differences between the two types of companies considered, Innovative SMEs and Startups.

Current status and revaluation index

Out of the sample of 103 companies, the two extremes are equivalent: while 8 companies are in liquidation, 8 others have undergone exits (4 IPOs and 4 acquisitions).

Of the other 87 companies, 36 still went through an additional round of capital raising either privately or through crowdfunding, with an average revaluation multiple of 3.3. Among these companies, three distributed dividends in the years following the campaign.

The Polytechnic synthesizes this data into an “issuer revaluation index.” The “Net asset value” for those who had ideally invested in all campaigns on CrowdFundMe grew by an average of 3.81 times: 249 points (versus 170 points for the market average)

CrowdFundMe CEO Tommaso Baldissera Pacchetti commented, “I a grateful for the meticulous and detailed work of the team (Alessia Salvatori, Antonio Sciacca, Benedetta Tabarelli, Gaia Tiberi, Carlotta Tripodi, and Edoardo Votta) and their mentor, Prof. Giancarlo Giudici. Congratulations to Benedetto Pirro for the selection work carried out within CrowdFundMe, together with Luca Sellari Franceschini, Gianluca Brigatti, and Marco Iovine.”

__

(Featured image by fototommy via Pixabay)

DISCLAIMER: This article was written by a third party contributor and does not reflect the opinion of Born2Invest, its management, staff or its associates. Please review our disclaimer for more information.

This article may include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believe,” “project,” “estimate,” “become,” “plan,” “will,” and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks as well as uncertainties, including those discussed in the following cautionary statements and elsewhere in this article and on this site. Although the Company may believe that its expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, the actual results that the Company may achieve may differ materially from any forward-looking statements, which reflect the opinions of the management of the Company only as of the date hereof. Additionally, please make sure to read these important disclosures.

First published in Crowdfunding buzz, a third-party contributor translated and adapted the article from the original. In case of discrepancy, the original will prevail.

Although we made reasonable efforts to provide accurate translations, some parts may be incorrect. Born2Invest assumes no responsibility for errors, omissions, or ambiguities in the translations provided on this website. Any person or entity relying on translated content does so at their own risk. Born2Invest is not responsible for losses caused by such reliance on the accuracy or reliability of translated information. If you wish to report an error or inaccuracy in the translation, we encourage you to contact us.

J. Frank Sigerson is a business and financial journalist primarily covering crypto, cannabis, crowdfunding, technology, and marketing. He also writes about the movers and shakers in the stock market, especially in biotech, healthcare, mining, and blockchain. In the past, he has shared his thoughts on IT and design, social media, pop culture, food and wine, TV, film, and music. His works have been published in Investing.com, Equities.com, Seeking Alpha, Mogul, Small Cap Network, CNN, Technology.org, among others.