Crypto
Ripple vs. SEC – Good News for XRP from the Lawsuit
Ripple (XRP) and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have been battling it out in court for almost two years. But the power-conscious authority can no longer get out of the defensive as a plaintiff, as developments show. Litigation observer Jeremy Hogan, himself a lawyer, is therefore already commenting on the SEC’s latest letter on Twitter as a “game changer” in favor of Ripple and XRP.
Ripple (XRP) experienced a shock and price plunge in December 2020 when the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) sued the crypto company. Ripple needed SEC approval to sell XRP because the cryptocurrency was marketed in that case as an equity interest with the prospect of profit in the company, the agency argues. It classifies XRP as a “security.” However, in 22 months of litigation now, it has become apparent that the SEC is having significant problems backing up its charges with evidence.
If you want to read more about the Ripple – SEC lawsuit and how it influenced the price of XRP, download for free our companion app, available for both iOS and Android devices. The Born2Invest mobile app brings you the latest business news of the day so you can stay on top of the market.
Recent developments in the lawsuit also indicate how the SEC has floundered
Two details stand out in this regard; the starting point is the written verdict requested individually by both sides in September. In recent days, both Ripple and the SEC have provided further documents on this. In the SEC’s submission, it is noticeable that it continues to not object to a single specific sales contract of XRP and, moreover, does not present any evidence that Ripple has made any kind of commitment to guarantee future participation to buyers of XRP. Instead, the SEC stiffens on phrases like “radical positions” and “strained arguments” to attack Ripple. Litigation observer Jeremy Hogan, himself a lawyer, is therefore already commenting on the SEC’s latest letter on Twitter as a “game changer” in favor of Ripple and XRP.
The latest document from Ripple to the court also pleases the camp pro-XRP. Because for the first time Ripple refers in it also to investors who are represented as an independent litigants by John Deaton. Ripple cites these investors (around 3,000 according to Deaton) as evidence that there were massive XRP sales without contracts and that these investors expected profits not from Ripple but from the free markets and other sources. Deaton interpreted this move by Ripple to his clients on Twitter as positive.
Conclusion: how will things end for XRP in the process with SEC
The crypto trade public assesses the developments in the proceedings SEC vs. Ripple since spring mostly positive for XRP. The regulator has been hopelessly bogged down in this view and has to accept one stage defeat after another, for example, including the infamous “Hinman speech”. XRP was able to temporarily benefit from these forecasts and enjoyed a rally in September. But to pop the champagne corks in the Ripple and XRP camp, it is probably still too early. A court ruling is still pending and an out-of-court settlement between the SEC and Ripple remains only a theoretical option.
__
(Featured image by sergeitokmakov via Pixabay)
DISCLAIMER: This article was written by a third party contributor and does not reflect the opinion of Born2Invest, its management, staff or its associates. Please review our disclaimer for more information.
This article may include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believe,” “project,” “estimate,” “become,” “plan,” “will,” and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks as well as uncertainties, including those discussed in the following cautionary statements and elsewhere in this article and on this site. Although the Company may believe that its expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, the actual results that the Company may achieve may differ materially from any forward-looking statements, which reflect the opinions of the management of the Company only as of the date hereof. Additionally, please make sure to read these important disclosures.
First published in BLOCK-BUILDERS.DE, a third-party contributor translated and adapted the article from the original. In case of discrepancy, the original will prevail.
Although we made reasonable efforts to provide accurate translations, some parts may be incorrect. Born2Invest assumes no responsibility for errors, omissions or ambiguities in the translations provided on this website. Any person or entity relying on translated content does so at their own risk. Born2Invest is not responsible for losses caused by such reliance on the accuracy or reliability of translated information. If you wish to report an error or inaccuracy in the translation, we encourage you to contact us.
-
Markets2 weeks ago
Why FCOJ Futures Closed Lower This Past Week
-
Crowdfunding1 week ago
Lemonway Case: InnovUp’s Appeal to Bankitalia to Prevent the Halt to Italian Lending Crowdfunding
-
Fintech2 weeks ago
Paybyrd Chooses Mangopay to Optimize its Merchants’ Payment Experience
-
Africa4 days ago
The Fez-Meknes Regional Council Launches a Third Wave of Development Projects