Bitcoin (BTC) as a symbol for successful cryptocurrencies is once again in the spotlight and in this wake, investors are increasingly interested in alternative coins. IOTA is often mentioned, especially in German-language media.
That is because the IOTA Foundation behind the project is registered in Berlin and the idea of IOTA also has its appeal: in the Internet of Things (IoT), IOTA wants to serve as a standard for networking and digital currency. However, while IoT devices have long since moved into private smart homes, IOTA is struggling with stagnation and internal problems.
Read more details about IOTA and why investing in IOTA would not be such a great idea with the Born2Invest app. Our companion app brings you the latest business news in the world so you can stay on top of the market.
Unlike Bitcoin (BTC) and almost all other cryptocurrencies, IOTA is not organized in a decentralized manner
This means that a basic principle is not fulfilled. Decentralization guarantees that no one can exert influence on transfers, cash ledgers, and contracts in the ecosystem of a cryptocurrency. This is organized technologically in a blockchain. In IOTA, instead of a blockchain, there is the so-called Tanglenet, in the center of which a coordinator makes transfers valid. The IOTA Foundation controls the coordinator. It can thus shut down the Tanglenet at any time, as has already happened several times.
Theoretically, money transfers could also be stopped and changed by the coordinator. The IOTA Foundation is aware of this fundamental problem and wanted to shut down the coordinator for many years under the project name Coordicide. However, this project, also known as IOTA 2.0, is still a long time coming and is technologically more difficult than initially thought.
Coordicide as an unfulfilled promise is just one example of the fact that schedules are not valid for IOTA
Currently, IOTA 1.5 is stuck in a time crunch as an interim step, with implementation most recently postponed until early 2021. We recall other projects such as the official IOTA Wallet, which were first significantly delayed and then still had security vulnerabilities. If IOTA’s roadmap is understood as a timetable, confidence in the development work is regularly disappointed. Add to that critics who believe: coordicide on IOTA could be technologically impossible.
IOTA’s founders are at odds
There were four heads who launched IOTA around 2015. Co-founder Sergey Ivancheglo (CFB) left the IOTA foundation already in the summer of 2019 in a dispute. Co-founder David Sønstebø was relieved of all offices in the IOTA Foundation against his will in December 2020. IOTA thus lost its expertise and mouthpiece.
Remaining are co-founder Dominik Schiener, whose powers, enshrined in the IOTA Foundation’s bylaws, have long been unknown and worry skeptics. Co-founder number four, Serguei Popov, is hardly noticeable in public, but continues to sit on the board of IOTA. This mishmash does not bode well and proves through publicly fought controversies that it is a reason for IOTA’s reform gridlock.
IOTA’s price curve is barely moving
For almost two years, IOTA has been trading at around $0.30. The price is similar to that of a so-called stablecoin, i.e. a cryptocurrency that tracks a real currency such as the euro or the dollar.
For investors, stablecoins are an important tool for implementing their strategies in day trading with cryptocurrencies. However, a stablecoin neither protects against inflation nor offers special profit opportunities. The barely existing price development of IOTA against the euro clearly demonstrates how the market is losing faith in IOTA.
The situation becomes even more dramatic if we put the price curve of IOTA in relation to Bitcoin
BTC is the undisputed leader among cryptocurrencies. When the price of Bitcoin rises, as it has for months now, it pulls the price of many altcoins up with it. With IOTA, however, this no longer happens and so IOTA to BTC has now reached an all-time low. In plain language: It would have been better to buy Bitcoin instead of IOTA at any time in the past years.
The status of the IOTA Foundation as a non-profit institution seems to be at risk
Possible insider trading, self-enrichment by IOTA founders, and suspected shortfalls in the IOTA Foundation’s finances are three of the reasons why it is no longer certain that the IOTA Foundation will be allowed to remain a nonprofit.
If the construct were to collapse, IOTA would lose its control center for development and collaborations. Leaks about IOTA repeatedly reveal that the founders are also afraid of a situation in which the foundation is officially stripped of its recognized and trust-building status.
IOTA as a cryptocurrency is losing ground and importance
After all, the smart move of the project was actually to provide a technological network and means of payment in the growth area of IoT and become the standard. And at the EU level, for example, IOTA is succeeding in landing funding.
But almost all of IOTA Foundation’s collaborations revolve around technological solutions, not IOTA as a digital currency. The dilemma is also reflected in IOTA dropping out of the top 30 most highly valued cryptocurrencies in 2020. The technology of IOTA has certain appeal, but just without IOTA as a monetary digital currency.
Investors keep losing money on IOTA
In 2020, it was the hack of the Trinity wallet where investors lost money and the IOTA network had to be shut down for 1 month as a result. Transactions could not be made at that time. This was also far from the first incident involving the Trinity wallet.
IOTA – better wait and see with investment
No matter when you would have invested in Bitcoin in recent years: Your investment would be now clearly in the plus, with IOTA it would stagnate at +/-20 percent. The stock market is also booming again, reflecting the need for profit opportunities that offset inflation risks and zero interest rates. So why get into IOTA now, tying up capital? If IOTA manages to get on the road to success, there is then still the possibility to get financially involved there. Currently, however, IOTA is risky, that crypto year 2020 was anything but successful for IOTA.
The signs for IOTA are also rather negative for 2021. The technological need to catch up with other crypto projects is considerable and the internal problems do the rest to express considerable doubts about the future viability of IOTA. Despite all sympathy for the original and smart concept of IOTA: Investment opportunities are better found elsewhere; IOTA has not been able to keep up with last year’s success stories such as Bitcoin, Ethereum or Tesla, Apple or Amazon for some time now for the reasons mentioned.
DISCLAIMER: This article was written by a third party contributor and does not reflect the opinion of Born2Invest, its management, staff or its associates. Please review our disclaimer for more information.
This article may include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believe,” “project,” “estimate,” “become,” “plan,” “will,” and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks as well as uncertainties, including those discussed in the following cautionary statements and elsewhere in this article and on this site. Although the Company may believe that its expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, the actual results that the Company may achieve may differ materially from any forward-looking statements, which reflect the opinions of the management of the Company only as of the date hereof. Additionally, please make sure to read these important disclosures.
First published in BLOCK-BUILDERS.de, a third-party contributor translated and adapted the article from the original. In case of discrepancy, the original will prevail.
Although we made reasonable efforts to provide accurate translations, some parts may be incorrect. Born2Invest assumes no responsibility for errors, omissions or ambiguities in the translations provided on this website. Any person or entity relying on translated content does so at their own risk. Born2Invest is not responsible for losses caused by such reliance on the accuracy or reliability of translated information. If you wish to report an error or inaccuracy in the translation, we encourage you to contact us.
Cepsa Plans to Build a Hydroproduct to Import Hydrogen from Morocco
According to Cepsa's chief executive, the industry needs a hydrogen price of between $2 and $2.5 and around $3 or...
Same Old, Same Old Crummy Market
But these are little issues compared to the performance difference between the stock market and commodities seen since November 2021. Has...
Stock Markets Have Definitely Seen Better Days
It has been the worst start since 1939. Yes, we have to go back that far to find a year...
What is the Best Social Media for Your Business?
It’s time to dispel the myth of the “best social media for business”. Learn more about the demographic data behind...
Amateur Sports Leagues Win Big as FOXD Network Partners With CXSports
Aimed squarely at amateur and semi-professional sports leagues and teams, sports broadcaster FOXD Network has just partnered up with CXSports....
Cannabis2 weeks ago
The Global CBD Gummies Market Will Reach $12 Billion by 2028
Featured2 weeks ago
Understanding the Fed’s Rate Hike: the Long Term Goal of 2.0% Inflation
Featured2 weeks ago
Why Rice Supplies Are Tight and Demand Is Holding Together
Cannabis2 weeks ago
Why the Cannabis Market Has Growing Investment Prospects