Amazon and Microsoft are the two leading cloud computing providers. Each has great strengths and a huge future. For investors wanting a cloud-related play, the question becomes which one to bet on unless one chooses to bet on both. But Google is also in the game raising the question of whether or not its rare position as an underdog is a reason to bet on its long-term growth.
Amazon and Microsoft are the undisputed cloud leaders
The Street’s Jon Markman breathlessly declares that “while most of the world is arguing about data, privacy and the influence of big technology companies” that the real “players have already moved on.” In a few sentences, he waves away not only a growing anti-monopoly movement, reasonable concerns raised about privacy, without mentioning Facebook, and Apple’s move into services, without mentioning the implications of what happens when Apple goes beyond bundling consumer media options and digs into enterprise services. That’s a lot to wave away in order to position Amazon and Microsoft as the leaders in a race to cloud computing. Especially when they are already understood to be the leaders in cloud computing.
But every columnist has to have a shtick and Markman is absolutely correct in stating that Amazon and Microsoft are making big moves. For this recent take on the matter, Markman focuses on Amazon’s deal with Volkswagen to create a “standardized, industrial cloud for factories, supply chains,
Markman correctly notes that the planned implementation of both projects involves an openness in data exchange that is still a relatively new way for enterprise operations to approach such matters. Amazon and Volkswagen are not competitors but Amazon is building something that they want to make available to other companies which might just mean competitors of Volkswagen. Microsoft, on the other hand, is working with actual competitors to build something that would then be available to other competitors. But just as Amazon’s play further positions it as a cloud leader, so too will Microsoft’s willingness to work with competitors strengthen its leading position.
Too big to worry about anti-monopoly concerns?
Regarding “data privacy and monopolies,” Markman believes that political concerns which are also very much personal concerns are “distractions only.” But there’s no reason to believe that anyone in actual power in these companies thinks that the case. Regardless, Markman believes this too will pass and that it’s the biggest players that will win. That may well be the case but what he seems to be missing is quite obvious.
When giants create open systems that benefit competitors they are no longer as vulnerable to monopoly charges. And if they are able to resolve privacy and also security issues by best practices that are actually enabled by cloud computing, then they are suddenly on the right side of technological progress. That’s a big if but, by providing the infrastructure for whatever comes next, Amazon and Microsoft can both benefit whether that infrastructure is driving a new age of privacy or the next stage of an emerging surveillance society.
But what about Google?
It’s strange to talk about tech giants and the future of privacy and monopolies without talking about Google, a powerful force that is also a target of attacks. It’s true that Google is struggling to catch up in the push to provide services in the cloud. The company is known for requiring users to do a lot more of the heavy lifting to interface with their cloud services than do either Amazon or Microsoft. On the other hand, Google’s expertise in AI is helping it attract customers who want more than just traditional services in the cloud even though AI may become a political liability for Google quicker than for other companies.
Actually, Google is not in the discussion for a lot of reasons beyond being a distant third. The truth is, Google continues to stumble more often than not when it goes beyond its expertise in search and advertising. And the things that make that expertise profitable are exactly the aspects of big tech currently under attack. However social and political issues play out, Amazon and Microsoft are killing it with cloud services and it is their game to lose.
Buy both Amazon and Microsoft for the win
That’s why Markman says investors should buy both companies “into every major decline.” He rightly sees Microsoft and Amazon as the “best positioned to win from the cloud revolution.” And he’s not alone in that assessment by any means. At the end of 2018, Joe Tenebruso, writing for The Motley Fool, addressed the question of which is the “Better Buy: Amazon vs Microsoft.” After laying out the data and arguments, he concluded that the smart move is probably buying both companies’ stock, “thereby doubling your chances at profiting from the expansion of the massive global cloud-computing market in the years ahead.”
(Featured image by issaro prakalung via Shutterstock)
Not all software IPOs are created equal
It's never a good idea to pour money into a company just because it's a tech company. Not every company...
How are sustainable labels awarded and what they stand for
There is no shared definition of the concept of "sustainable finance", which leaves a wide margin of interpretation when it...
B2B only: Spotcap sells credit business to Ferratum
The Spotcap-Ferratum deal is further proof that the German fintech industry is being shaken up in the corona crisis, at...
Domestic demand versus export demand: which is better?
Palm Oil closed lower on ideas of decreasing production and private reports of weaker demand. It is seasonally a time...
What is happening with the American Capitalism
Unsurprisingly, Wall Street is once again clamoring for another shot of heroin because all those trillions of dollars that were...
Featured6 days ago
Which fintech company raised the most funds in Q3 2020?
Crypto7 days ago
Ripple’s CTO sells 40,000 Ethereum for $1 per token
Africa4 days ago
Fruitbox Africa: Frankfurt investor and Siemens to create jobs in Ethiopia
Business7 days ago
How to grow your small business through Amazon advertising