The voting environment in America has been forever changed. That’s because the significant vulnerability of the country’s election systems and the fear of election “interference” by foreign or domestic operatives are genuine.
With midterm elections only seven months away, this situation weighs heavily on the minds of both candidates and public officials responsible for ensuring secure and accurate election results. While hacking of American voting systems is a relatively new challenge, technical problems caused by the advanced age of most voting machines are not new.
Technology in recent years set the bar for improved voting efficiency by replacing paper ballot systems with electronic voting machines. But the new technology, which does not leave a paper trail, tends to fall short when it comes to security, accuracy and attacks by hackers. Too many voting machines currently in use have not been replaced or updated in more than a decade, and a high percentage have exceeded their life expectancy.
With almost irrefutable evidence that Russia hacked into U.S. election systems in 2016 in an attempt to influence the presidential campaign, there is now a concerted effort to address election accuracy. The Department of Homeland Security has warned representatives of each of the 50 states of possible malicious cyber attacks.
One meager attempt to arm election officials nationwide with tools to combat cyber attacks was the recent passage by Congress of the omnibus spending bill. It includes funding for securing digital election systems. Some fear it may be too late—and the $380 million allocated is certainly too little—to address every system in the country. The money, however, is earmarked for making security improvements, implementing cybersecurity guidelines and replacing outdated voting machines. But one looming problem is the fact that funding allocations are based on population, not on need.
Election cybersecurity has been acknowledged as under significant threat. Yet, an updated version of the Secure Elections Act has gained little traction in Congress. The bill addresses ways to deal with the vulnerability of America’s election systems and threats to voter registration and personal voter information. It also focuses on social media campaigns waged by foreign operatives featuring false election information and provides funding to states through a grant program.
The gravity of election system hackings was the subject of an open letter to American voters circulated recently by top election officials of the Department of Homeland Security and national organizations that deal with election issues. The letter acknowledged that efforts to modernize cybersecurity are necessary to protect against interference by foreign operatives. It explained that the task will require upgrading the technology and investing in experienced cybersecurity staff. Election officials agree that such an effort must be continuous and will “carry a significant price tag.”
Already, many local officials are trying to secure election systems before the November general election. When the Minnesota legislature approved creating a $7 million grant to help county and city officials purchase new voting equipment, the applications flooding in doubled the available amount of funding. Ohio’s Secretary of State is urging state legislators to find $118 million to fund new voting equipment. Pennsylvania’s Westmoreland County is trying to purchase new voting machines to replace 850 touchscreen machines purchased 13 years ago. New machines are needed to comply with a state directive mandating that new voting machines have paper trails that can be verified.
In Hunt County, Texas, the elections administrator has requested $1.5 million from county coffers for new voting machines. New York’s governor has asked for $5 million to strengthen cyber protections and provide cyber risk vulnerability assessments for states and counties. Louisiana’s Secretary of State plans to ask the state for $50 million in funding to purchase new voting machines.
It would be almost impossible to find a citizen or taxpayer who doubts the need to upgrade the country’s election system equipment. It is critical to preserve the integrity of all elections and our democracy. However, the problem is that securing funding in time to ensure voting safety in November simply may not be possible.
DISCLAIMER: This article expresses my own ideas and opinions. Any information I have shared are from sources that I believe to be reliable and accurate. I did not receive any financial compensation for writing this post, nor do I own any shares in any company I’ve mentioned. I encourage any reader to do their own diligent research first before making any investment decisions.
Before investing in crowdfunding, be aware of the structure surrounding the platforms
Although the crowdfunding ecosystem is diverse and opens the door for those who want to start investing, it also requires...
Legalization trend drives cannabis ETFs to significantly grow
More and more US states are legalizing the use of cannabis. The trend around the plant is not only boosting...
VB Devices closes a €1.1 million round to consolidate its market entry
The operation of the Spanish startup VB Devices has raised more than $488,000 (€400,000) between new investors and current partners...
ESMA now wants to regulate ESG rating agencies
ESMA focuses on two “pain points” with regard to ESG ratings. On the one hand, it calls for minimum regulatory...
Bitcoin whale alert: major investors dump large amounts of BTC
Bitcoin whales have sold off larger amounts of Bitcoin (BTC) this month, according to the latest data from aggregator Glassnode....
Business6 days ago
One eye on the future, another on the past— LODE is solving the gold and silver liquidity problem
Featured6 days ago
Amundi will pay managers based on ESG returns
Business6 days ago
The markets continued their relentless climb with new all-time highs once again
Crowdfunding5 days ago
How can private banking support the crowdfunding sector