Connect with us


Can government mining drive the price of BTC?

Internationally isolated states such as Iran and North Korea have entered Bitcoin mining in order to be able to conduct foreign trade through BTC without the banking system. There are apparently similar signs in Venezuela, where the state treasury is on the brink of bankruptcy. Do such Bitcoin miners influence the price of BTC?



This picture show a bitcoin coin.

In some states, Bitcoin (BTC) is apparently not only developing into an attractive alternative to the unstable national currencies for the population but also the state leaderships seem to be discovering the advantages of the cryptocurrency for themselves. At least there are increasing reports that Iran and North Korea, for example, are mining Bitcoin through government agencies. 

Both countries are cut off from the international banking system by U.S. sanctions and thus see in BTC the possibility of conducting foreign trade nevertheless. In Venezuela, which is plagued by hyperinflation, there are also signs that private Bitcoin Mining is being nationalized by force. Thus investors ask themselves: Can such state-owned Bitcoin miners have an effect on the price curve of BTC?

Read more about governmental Bitcoin mining and how this activity could influence the price of Bitcoin with our companion app. Born2Invest brings you the latest economic news in the world.

Background on Bitcoin Mining in crisis states

It is known from Iran that power stations there are required to take over Bitcoin Mining as an additional task. Specialized hardware for this comes from China, which is already circumventing sanctions through oil and gas deals with Iran. Similar things can be heard from North Korea, even though the news situation there is thin due to self-imposed isolation. From Venezuela there have been clear indications for some time that the population is using Bitcoin as a substitute currency. What is new there is news that the police are confiscating the equipment of private Asic Miners and making them work for themselves.

It is estimated that at least 100,000 BTC worth the equivalent of a good $1 billion are currently managed through such state pools. The special thing: cryptocurrencies serve neither as a store of value nor as an object of speculation, but are obviously used as a substitute for Fiat in foreign trade. 

Iran, for example, is to buy Russian timber in exchange for BTC, and North Korea needs medicines and technology. The acceptance of experts: The Bitcoin, which is charged in foreign trade, remains in active circulation and reacts at best with a delay to price fluctuations among trading partners. However, their absolute quantity – and this indicator is rising – withdraws liquidity from the overall market for Bitcoin. 

A possible scenario: If state-owned BTC miners continue to take market share from private miners, the amount of freely tradable Bitcoin will decrease, which in turn could drive the price.

Conclusion: Do not underestimate state Bitcoin miners

Admittedly, the invoice with the BTCs used for foreign trade is one with many uncertainties. What if, after all, Russian companies in the trade chain turn their BTCs back into fiat on crypto exchanges? What if China insists on an E-Yuan for its business transactions in the future, without any sanctions? However, one thing is clear: The absolute number of Bitcoin, which is used by the state as a trading currency to generate substantial sales at the crypto exchanges, has reached astonishing levels and a reversal of the trend is not in sight. 

Medium-term this development is rather a price driver for BTC, because the private demand in the western world for Bitcoin continues to rise with not least by the Bitcoin Halving limited supply.


(Featured image by Dmitri Demidko via Unsplash)

DISCLAIMER: This article was written by a third party contributor and does not reflect the opinion of Born2Invest, its management, staff or its associates. Please review our disclaimer for more information.

This article may include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believe,” “project,” “estimate,” “become,” “plan,” “will,” and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks as well as uncertainties, including those discussed in the following cautionary statements and elsewhere in this article and on this site. Although the Company may believe that its expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, the actual results that the Company may achieve may differ materially from any forward-looking statements, which reflect the opinions of the management of the Company only as of the date hereof. Additionally, please make sure to read these important disclosures.

First published in BLOCK-BUILDERS.DE, a third-party contributor translated and adapted the article from the original. In case of discrepancy, the original will prevail.

Although we made reasonable efforts to provide accurate translations, some parts may be incorrect. Born2Invest assumes no responsibility for errors, omissions or ambiguities in the translations provided on this website. Any person or entity relying on translated content does so at their own risk. Born2Invest is not responsible for losses caused by such reliance on the accuracy or reliability of translated information. If you wish to report an error or inaccuracy in the translation, we encourage you to contact us.

Philip Gregg is a tech biz writer, with a keen understanding of blockchain technology, Internet of Things, and cloud services. He also serves as chief consultant for an IT business in Washington and a cryptowallet startup in Tokyo. Philip holds an MBA in finance and has previously worked at a Silicon Valley company before striking out on his own. He is a dad to three German Shepherds and owns a sweet vintage Mustang he fondly calls Sadie.