The week before we married (and long before we had our first baby), almost 30 years ago, my new boss turned to me and said, “Son, you’re never richer than the day before you get married.”
For the next three years, I was reminded daily of his words. Decisions that I made alone before our marriage now required consent, or at least forewarning. But then I realized my boss had not just been wrong; he’d lied.
He knew the truth
It wasn’t the marriage that made you poor; it was the kids.
While my wife and I had to hash out how we spent our joint income after marriage, we still spent those dollars on ourselves, and we could make choices. When it came to kids, we had no choice. Whatever they needed, we bought, even if on credit.
As for our needs and wants, well, they ended up somewhere between “Maybe one day,” and “When we win the lottery.”
I don’t begrudge the kids. In fact, I’m jealous that one of my friends just had a baby. He texted and said, “I highly recommend that you get one of these!”
Granted, it’s not exactly his kid. It’s his first grandbaby. But that’s nitpicking. I still want one. Not just for my personal enjoyment, but for the good of the nation. When it comes to having kids, we’ve fallen behind, which will tear through our economy like a 100-car train wreck.
But as someone once wrote, a train wreck in slow motion is still a train wreck. And this one is happening right before our eyes.
The baby bust
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Center for Health Statistics estimates that last year, we logged about 3.79 million births, which was down two percent from 2017. It’s the lowest level since 1987.
Keep in mind that during that time our population has increased, so on a percentage basis, births are even lower.
Populations need every woman of child-bearing age to have 2.1 children, enough to replace both parents and a little bit for mortality, to keep the population level flat. The U.S. hasn’t hit that mark since 1971. Last year, with births down 10 out of the last 11 years, we fell to the lowest level on record, 1.7 children per woman of child-bearing age.
Without children or a dramatic increase in migration, we won’t have a growing workforce, which we need to pay the taxes that will support our growing retired class.
Without kids, we won’t have millions of new parents who will need to buy stuff they didn’t know existed, and desperate to step up to bigger cars and houses as their children get older.
Japan has led the way
As the Japanese proved by dramatically reducing pregnancies in the 1950s and 1960s, the economy looks great for a while as consumers spent on themselves, but as they age they move toward saving and get downright stingy. The result is a stagnating economy with little growth and interest rates near zero.
Our future doesn’t look quite so bleak. We still have migration. And while our birthrate is low, it’s still the envy of most other developed nations. But that doesn’t mean there won’t be consequences.
Recently, the committee that runs the Medicare and Social Security trust funds reported that the funds will be broke in 2026 and 2035, respectively. We rely on payroll taxes to fund those programs. With fewer kids, we have fewer workers to pay the taxes. Those that remain will be required to pay a higher share of their income to support the growing, graying class. They won’t be happy about it.
And as Harry has written, there won’t be a millennial rush to buy the aging McMansions of Boomers if they aren’t trying to put distance between themselves and several of their annoying teenage kids.
Besides, one of the main reasons we don’t have as many children is that millennials are waiting longer. The only age group to log higher births last year was 35- to 44-year olds, implying that people are choosing to put off kids, at which point they typically have fewer. If it’s just the two of you and one child, do you really need 5,000 square feet?
Given that having fewer children can have a dramatic, and in many cases negative, influence on our economy, I for one am all for more kids. Starting with my own. Or at least, my own grandkids. I’ll even kick in for some music lessons along the way if that will help.
(Featured image by DepositPhotos)
DISCLAIMER: This article expresses my own ideas and opinions. Any information I have shared are from sources that I believe to be reliable and accurate. I did not receive any financial compensation for writing this post, nor do I own any shares in any company I’ve mentioned. I encourage any reader to do their own diligent research first before making any investment decisions.
Before investing in crowdfunding, be aware of the structure surrounding the platforms
Although the crowdfunding ecosystem is diverse and opens the door for those who want to start investing, it also requires...
Legalization trend drives cannabis ETFs to significantly grow
More and more US states are legalizing the use of cannabis. The trend around the plant is not only boosting...
VB Devices closes a €1.1 million round to consolidate its market entry
The operation of the Spanish startup VB Devices has raised more than $488,000 (€400,000) between new investors and current partners...
ESMA now wants to regulate ESG rating agencies
ESMA focuses on two “pain points” with regard to ESG ratings. On the one hand, it calls for minimum regulatory...
Bitcoin whale alert: major investors dump large amounts of BTC
Bitcoin whales have sold off larger amounts of Bitcoin (BTC) this month, according to the latest data from aggregator Glassnode....
Business6 days ago
One eye on the future, another on the past— LODE is solving the gold and silver liquidity problem
Featured6 days ago
Amundi will pay managers based on ESG returns
Business6 days ago
The markets continued their relentless climb with new all-time highs once again
Crowdfunding5 days ago
How can private banking support the crowdfunding sector