Measuring impact: sustainable development is not a hard science
There has been an attempt to judge responsible investment approaches in the light of performance. If the irreducible will always continue to doubt it, most of this debate tends to exist in favor of a new subject: impact measurement. The willingness to invest in such a way as to generate positive impacts, by agreeing not to blindly follow market indices, to take an active approach to investment.
How to assess the impact of a responsible investment approach? Some indicators of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDOs) are contradictory and the logic of a product’s “life cycle” is complex. The difficulty of the exercise is like a pretext for inaction. By Ladislas Smia, co-responsible for Mirova’s research, and Philippe Zaouati, Mirova’s Managing Director.
For a long time, there has been an attempt to judge responsible investment approaches in the light of performance. Financial, of course. For many, investing responsibly meant reducing performance. Many studies have sought to verify this hypothesis, generally concluding that SRI (Socially Responsible Investment) does not only fail to destroy performance, but can even help to better manage risks and detect opportunities.
Impact measurement and the doubt
If the irreducible will always continue to doubt it, most of this debate tends to exist in favor of a new subject: impact measurement. Most investors now want indicators to know how many tonnes of CO2 “emit” their investments, how many cubic metres of water they have managed to save and, more generally, how they contribute to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDOs).
The question of impact measurement is popular in the regulations. In France, Article 173 of the Energy Transition Act requires all investors to disclose the ESG and carbon risks of their assets. A similar regulation adopted at European level. While we believe that this development is necessary, if not essential, impact measurement remains a difficult exercise for those who are really trying it.
Intent as a first step
We sometimes imagine that the impact only concerns certain investors – those who seek to have it -, certain types of projects or companies, such as actors in the social and solidarity economy or micro-finance. This is of course a mistake. All companies, regardless of their sector, size or geographical location, have an impact on society.
Negative, if they are, for example, highly polluting, produce unhealthy food or treat their employees badly. Positive, when they contribute to the creation of quality employment, the improvement of energy efficiency or when they develop innovative health solutions. Most often, they have both positive and negative impacts.
Investors and the impact
The investors who finance these companies bear some responsibility. Thus, while not all investors are “impact investors“, all investors have an impact. Of course, these investors are only one stakeholder among many. Employees, managers, suppliers, consumers, public authorities all contribute more or less directly to the realization of the company’s project. But it is essential to recognize this part of their responsibility, which has long been ignored, and by extension the role they must play in the emergence of a more sustainable economy.
These investors must still accept it. Because the first impact criterion is neither the method nor the result of the measurement, but the reality of the intention. The willingness to invest in such a way as to generate positive impacts, by agreeing not to blindly follow market indices, to take an active approach to investment and commitment, to reallocate capital. In other words, the first step is to ensure what is the “intentionality” of the investor.
(Featured Image By Markus Spiske)
First published in latribune, a third-party contributor translated and adapted the article from the original. In case of discrepancy, the original will prevail.
Although we made reasonable efforts to provide accurate translations, some parts may be incorrect. Born2Invest assumes no responsibility for errors, omissions or ambiguities in the translations provided on this website. Any person or entity relying on translated content does so at their own risk. Born2Invest is not responsible for losses caused by such reliance on the accuracy or reliability of translated information. If you wish to report an error or inaccuracy in the translation, we encourage you to contact us.
Attracting Foreign Investment, an Administrative Odyssey for Fintech Companies in Spain
A well-defined regulatory context will provide investors with greater legal guarantees and will probably contribute to incentivizing investment in the...
Better Opens a Subsidiary in Spain and Projects 5 Million Revenues Before 2025
Better works with healthcare professionals to determine which type of medications are best for patients, after having analyzed and parameterized their...
Cannabis Industry Trends in 2023 – How Are Cannabis Consumers Evolving?
The European medical cannabis industry plays a significant role in the global market. 80% of transactions in this market involve...
If the SEC Is “Killing Crypto,” Why’s It Not Killing KoreChain?
With the SEC now aggressively cracking down on crypto, crypto pundits are accusing it of “killing crypto in America.” But...
Helaba Promotes Energy Transition via Crowdfunding
Helaba Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen ( website) together with the Deutsche Leasing Group (website) launched its own crowdfunding platform. The pilot phase...
Africa7 days ago
Green Hydrogen: How Can Morocco Meet 4 to 8% of Global Demand?
Africa2 weeks ago
Cape Verde PM Asks Banks to Change Perception of Financing in Agriculture and Fisheries
Cannabis3 days ago
The First Application to Grow Medical Cannabis Was Received in Poland
Featured1 week ago
Peridot Solar Takes Over a 135 MW Agrivoltaic Project in Sicily from Iqony Solar Energy Solutions Italia