Following an express request from the banks, the entity presided over by Miguel Pesce, will sanction rules to regulate the activity. Summary proceedings opened against fintech companies for unauthorized financial intermediation.
Get the best business, fintech, and finance news from the most trusted sources in 80 words or less. Updated throughout the day, the Born2Invest mobile application is a professionally curated digest of business, and news in financial technology field summaries from the most reputable news organizations around the world.
Big banks complain about fintech disruption
The Central Bank of the Republic of Argentina (BCRA), is preparing to sanction a regulation for the activity of Fintech. This move follows an express request from the banks, which have been accusing fintech companies of unfair competition for some time.
The regulation, which will be discussed later at the usual “Board Directors” meeting, will build a framework to govern the two main sections of the Fintech business: consumer credit and electronic means of payment. Few companies occupy both spaces with as much prominence as Mercado Libre, which appears to be the biggest target of the regulation.
One of the central points that defined the regulation is the precision of what should be considered financial intermediation, the central activity of a bank that consists of attracting deposits from the public and lending them to a third party. Until now, the BCRA governed the principle that those who lent their own funds, as fintech companies usually do, were not subject to BCRA regulation and its costs.
Are fintech companies bending the law?
The banks are maintaining an old claim, directed at the BCRA, on this point. Fintech companies have unfairly disrupted the economy and put established players at a disadvantage. The BCRA has already opened files on some Fintech companies that grant loans to investigate whether unauthorized financial intermediation took place. The proceedings were initiated in the management of Cambiemos but could be accelerated.
“The only ones who can do financial intermediation in Argentina are those authorized by the Central Bank. Those who take deposits, and invest them without explaining to the client what they are doing with the money, can only be the banks.” BCRA President Miguel Pesce said that “The only thing Fintech can do with that money is to deposit it in a bank. They can’t do anything else,”.
According to Juan Pablo Bruzzo, president of the Argentine Chamber of Fintech, it is necessary to “explain what financial intermediation is and as of today, it is known as an old and ambiguous idea, that does not apply to the new business models. There are differences in interpretation, which in the face of a change of government can be accentuated.”
Virtual accounts are the crux of the issue
The Chamber only had informal contacts with the new BCRA leadership. The first formal meeting between both parties is scheduled for next Tuesday, January 14th. Bruzzo stated that “We maintain the expectation of being able to let the BCRA authorities know our position, and that they hear all the voices before the regulations come out. When we asked for the meeting, the response was quick and positive,”.
Another aspect that could be regulated is the interoperability between virtual accounts (with their key, called CVU) and bank accounts (with their Uniform Banking Key, CBU). That is, that money can be transferred between both instruments. The BCRA intends to prohibit legal entities from making transfers from CVU to CVU thus forcing them to use bank accounts.
The reason is that this mechanism was used by large companies for tax avoidance. Many supermarkets, or large chains, charged their customers with e-wallets and credited their funds to virtual accounts (generally Mercado Pago). In this way, they avoided the “check tax” that they did have to pay if they deposited in a bank account.
The “tax asymmetry” was always one of the aspects highlighted by the banks to discuss “unfair competition” from Fintech. It happens that each type of transfer, whether through banks or Fintech, has different tax treatments.
While accepting the need to equalize certain tax aspects, for Bruzzo, while accepting the need to equalize certain tax aspects, he warned that “there is no logic in killing interoperability. The state has to encourage any type of digital transaction because that discourages the use of cash and helps financial inclusion. In a strategic sense, the regulations should aim to do that. There is no point in going against Fintech.”
The regulations to be dealt with by the BCRA’s Board of Directors include the obligation for Fintech to not use the money in their clients’ “wallets” for their own investments or to fund loans to other clients. In a recent interview, and in a clear allusion to Mercado Libre, Pesce had anticipated: “If they want to give loans, they have to give them with their own capital. They can’t use the money they receive on deposit, nor the difference in the time they have were paid, as a mechanism to finance credit.”
DISCLAIMER: This article was written by a third party contributor and does not reflect the opinion of Born2Invest, its management, staff or its associates. Please review our disclaimer for more information.
This article may include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believe,” “project,” “estimate,” “become,” “plan,” “will,” and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks as well as uncertainties, including those discussed in the following cautionary statements and elsewhere in this article and on this site. Although the Company may believe that its expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, the actual results that the Company may achieve may differ materially from any forward-looking statements, which reflect the opinions of the management of the Company only as of the date hereof. Additionally, please make sure to read these important disclosures.
First published in infobae Economico, a third-party contributor translated and adapted the article from the original. In case of discrepancy, the original will prevail.
Although we made reasonable efforts to provide accurate translations, some parts may be incorrect. Born2Invest assumes no responsibility for errors, omissions or ambiguities in the translations provided on this website. Any person or entity relying on translated content does so at their own risk. Born2Invest is not responsible for losses caused by such reliance on the accuracy or reliability of translated information. If you wish to report an error or inaccuracy in the translation, we encourage you to contact us.
Delayed Brazilian entrepreneurship law: the harms to entrepreneurs
Regulations that were signed into Brazilian law on 28 February of this year have experienced a two month delay in...
A divided nation—a divided market: Credit Suisse weighs in on the presidential race
The US has never been more divided and this is being felt in the markets. The outcome of the presidential...
Battle of the markets: attacking the African hinterland
Containerized freight moving through the African continent’s ports is exploding. Even during any period of global deceleration, the continent’s container...
Crypto players want to be better regulated: are they crazy?
It is unusual to hear that a large number of industry stakeholders want stricter regulations, but this is exactly what...
Microfinance: a wise addition to the conscious investor’s portfolio?
In addition to microloans, microfinance institutions are increasingly offering savings accounts, insurance products and other related services, expanding the range...
Featured7 days ago
Green bonds, ESG and Covid bonds in fixed income funds
Featured6 days ago
IOTA secures its supremacy in the energy market with European partnership
Africa6 days ago
How the Ministry of Agriculture is trying to help farmers in Burkina Faso
Featured4 days ago
Are we moving towards 100% renewable energy in the coming years?