The $1 trillion Trump-promised federal infrastructure plan is back on the front burner and heating up – again. Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao this week predicted that “principles” of the plan, which the president says will leverage $200 billion in federal funding to generate private investments of $1 trillion over 10 years, will be out in a few weeks.
Last week, the president signed the 2017 Omnibus Funding Agreement that included $19.3 billion in infrastructure funding for the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). But, is it enough?
Wary of what will be included in the president’s Fiscal 2018 budget proposal and not knowing exactly what to expect from the federal infrastructure plan, state and local government officials and transportation industry experts are lobbying members of Congress hard. They are urging that not only should current federal transportation programs be continued, but also direct federal funding for state and local government projects should be increased.
As most know, the administration’s $1 trillion transportation plan is expected to center on private investment and alternative financing mechanisms. However, even if it generates private-sector funding at the level of $1 trillion, that amount alone will not bridge the $3.3 trillion-plus U.S. infrastructure funding shortfall over the next decade.
“There is no silver bullet, just a lot of silver BBs.” That’s how U.S. Sen. Benjamin Cardin described the conundrum facing state and local government leaders dealing with funding shortfalls. At a Tuesday congressional hearing on leveraging federal transportation funding, panelists explained that transportation needs can’t be solved by placing all responsibility on state and local governmental entities. There is an agreement that transportation officials need funding options just to maintain the current transportation infrastructure, but state and local leaders are arguing for continued investment from the federal government as well.
According to a summary by the U.S. House Appropriations Committee, the recently approved 2017 omnibus spending bill includes $19.3 billion in discretionary appropriations for DOT and $77.1 billion to both improve and maintain the nation’s transportation infrastructure. Nearly $1.8 billion is also earmarked for a number of safety programs and agencies within DOT.
Other funding includes the following:
– A total of $44 billion allocated for the Federal-aid Highways Program, similar to the appropriation from the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act for improvements to U.S. highways and bridges.
– While there is no funding set aside for high-speed rail, the Federal Railroad Administration has appropriated $1.85 billion for other projects. A total of $1.5 billion is allocated for Amtrak, including $328 million for Amtrak’s Northeast Corridor and $1.2 billion to support the National Network Safety and research programs.
– The Federal Transit Administration will receive $12.4 billion, with transit formula grants totaling $9.7 billion to help local communities build and maintain mass transit systems.
– Resources of $16.4 billion are allocated to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Funding will support air traffic control personnel. $1 billion will go to the FAA’s Next Generation Air Transportation System and $159 million will fund Contract Towers.
– The nation’s ports will benefit from $523 million earmarked for the Maritime Administration to increase the productivity, efficiency and safety of ports and intermodal water and land transportation.
– And, much to the relief of many state and local government officials, funding for TIGER (Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery) grants is included. Awarded by DOT, these grants go to states and local communities for infrastructure construction and improvements they otherwise could not afford. Trump has proposed eliminating TIGER grant funding in his 2018 budget proposal.
The economic benefits from transportation projects and the jobs they create should make infrastructure spending at the federal level a purely bipartisan issue.
DISCLAIMER: This article expresses my own ideas and opinions. Any information I have shared are from sources that I believe to be reliable and accurate. I did not receive any financial compensation in writing this post, nor do I own any shares in any company I’ve mentioned. I encourage any reader to do their own diligent research first before making any investment decisions.
Why insurance is a sensible investment for any growing business
Business owners need to recognize the importance of insurance and how it is a valuable investment for a company's future.
3 things business travelers need in their travel plans
Unsurprisingly, travel buyers are setting goals like reducing costs, improving compliance, and boosting traveler satisfaction in 2019. To meet those...
Pay-As-You-Go vs. Subscription: Which model is best for your business?
Netflix does it, Spotify does it, and even razor companies have gotten on the bandwagon by offering subscription services. How...
US crude oil tankers headed to China as trade talks resume
With trade talks between the U.S. and China resuming, several ships have been identified as oil tankers likely delivering U.S....
Gambling outlook for 2019: Will the UK’s crackdown have an impact on investors?
Regulatory changes in the UK's gambling industry are set to take effect this year. How would these affect potential investors?
- Business5 days ago
How AR and VR are changing EdTech
- Featured5 days ago
Banking tech trends to watch for in 2019
- Business5 days ago
5 great real estate markets for investors in 2019
- Entrepreneurship3 days ago
Why and how to invest in healthcare app development
- Business3 days ago
What zero trust security will mean for the payments industry
- Commodities4 days ago
Newmont Mining agrees to all-share takeover of Goldcorp Inc.
- Featured4 days ago
The best security options for high-end luxury homes
- Business3 days ago
How construction companies are embracing environmental compliance