The Canadian government wants to apply a new stress test on private lenders as a way for the federal government to cool the housing market further. There are a couple of factors to consider if this does get implemented.
What is the stress test?
In recent months, the Bank of Canada has been steadily hiking interest rates. There is a fear that with higher interest rates, a lot of Canadian borrowers won’t be able to afford higher mortgage payments.
To prepare the financial system for future interest rate hikes, the government implemented a stress test where borrowers need to be qualified at whichever is the higher rate: that offered by the bank plus two percent, or the five-year benchmark rate posted by the Bank of Canada.
For example, if the loan you are applying for from the bank is at 3.50 percent, then the bank will assess you as if you are paying the mortgage at a 5.50 percent interest. Currently, the stress test only applies to A lenders.
Who are the A lenders, B lenders, and private lenders?
The Canadian mortgage industry is divided into 3 segments.
The A lenders are the major banks such as TD Bank, CIBC, Royal Bank, Bank of Nova Scotia, Bank of Montreal, and National Bank.
The B lenders are Equitable Bank and Home Capital.
Private lenders could be a pooling of wealthy individuals who gather their funds together to lend it out.
Why are the Big 6 banks the only ones subject to the stress test?
Canada’s banking regulator, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions, regulates federal institutions like the Big 6 banks.
There are some credit unions that are voluntarily applying the stress tests, but so far private lenders and B lenders are not subject to this test.
What are the differences between A lenders, B lenders, and private lenders?
A lenders are banks that lends out at the cheapest interest rates with the most minimal of fees charged to borrowers. The requirements to qualify for a loan with an A lender is quite high and the tests to determine your ability to pay is strict too.
People who do not qualify for a loan from an A lender will go to a B lender. These B lenders generally charge a slightly a higher interest rate and will charge an upfront fee (generally 1 percent of the value of the loan). The difference here is the conditions to qualify for a loan is less stringent than A lender loans.
Private lenders are individuals with a wide range of conditions and requirements depending on what the lender wants.
After the stress test was implemented on the major banks, what happened to the mortgage industry?
Two things happened to the mortgage industry and housing market:
- Some borrowers were no longer able to afford a loan under the new stress test, and this slowed the housing market immensely. Of course, interest rate hikes played a role too to slow the housing market.
- The demand for mortgage loans not subject to the stress test grew. The market share in the GTA region grew to 9 percent from 6 percent a year earlier (a year after the stress test was implemented). Indirectly, the purpose of the stress test was to reduce overall risk in the economy but it seems like a lot of the risk just shifted from the A lenders to B lenders and private lenders.
What happens if the stress test is applied to private lenders?
The verdict is still out on whether applying a stress test will work for private lenders. First, private lenders are under the regulation of the provinces and so each province will need to come up with a harmonized way to apply the stress test.
Also, private mortgages generally charge a very high interest rate, reportedly, it’s been 10 to 13 percent, therefore an extra two percent will not add that much of a burden. If borrowers truly want to borrow money, they would find some other way.
The main purpose of applying the two percent stress test rule is to slow down the rate of growth of private loans. But it’s not quite sure how effective the stress test would be and how provincial regulators would enforce such a rule.
Reports say discussions about this are underway—whether it becomes a reality remains to be seen.
(Featured image by DepositPhotos)
DISCLAIMER: This article expresses my own ideas and opinions. Any information I have shared are from sources that I believe to be reliable and accurate. I did not receive any financial compensation for writing this post, nor do I own any shares in any company I’ve mentioned. I encourage any reader to do their own diligent research first before making any investment decisions.
The TopRanked.io Weekly Digest: What’s Hot in Affiliate Marketing [++ A2 Hosting Affiliates Review]
Something's brewing in the Right to Repair space. Lawmakers are increasingly law-making. DIY fixer upperers are increasingly fixer uppering. And,...
Why the Carbon Credit Market Is Not Working
The Carbon Brief analysis focused on 34 companies that alone used 38 million tons of carbon dioxide over the period...
Recrowd, Real Estate Lending Platform, Finally Gets European Authorization
Recrowd adopts a distinct approach for less sophisticated investors, limiting their investments to under €1,000 or 5% of their net...
Why the Amounts Invested in Belgian Fintech Companies Decreased
In 2023, the Belgian fintech sector has not witnessed any major fundraising events similar to those in previous years, such...
Bitcoin Soars 130% This Year: Will It Reach New All-Time Highs in 2024?
Bitcoin is currently trading within an ascending channel, maintaining support at $35,000, with an upward trajectory towards the psychological resistance...
Biotech2 weeks ago
Eli Lilly Builds a New Production Center with an Investment of $2.5 Billion
Markets5 days ago
Setting Aside the Magnificent Seven, Gold Has Been a Star Performer Since the Start of the Millennium
Biotech1 week ago
European Patent Office Invalidates Moderna’s RNA Solution
Crowdfunding3 days ago
“People Mobil Herzogenrath” Was Created Through Crowdfunding