Crowdfunding
Real Estate Crowdfunding Increased by 60% in Q3 2021 Compared to 2020
In the first 9 months of 2021, 16 real estate projects were funded (there were 13 in 2020). But not only the number of projects has increased, but also the average collection: each project has in fact collected an average of $2 million (€1.7 million), while in 2020 the average collection had been just below $1.6 million (€1.4 million).
In the first three quarters of this year, in fact, equity and lending crowdfunding platforms dedicated to real estate projects have collected $77.3 million (€66.6 million) compared to $48.5 million (€41.8 million) in the same period of 2020, with a growth, therefore, equal to 60%.
In particular, in the first 9 months of 2021, real estate equity crowdfunding platforms raised $32 million (€27.5 million) compared to $21 million (€18 in 2020, a growth of 52.7%, while real estate lending crowdfunding platforms reached, in the same period, $45.4 million (€39.1 million compared to $27.6 million (€23.8 million) last year, for a growth of 64.5%.
Read more about the real estate equity crowdfunding and the real estate lending crowdfunding sectors and find the latest business news in the world with our companion app, Born2Invest.
Real estate equity crowdfunding
In the first 9 months of 2021, 16 real estate projects were funded (there were 13 in 2020). But not only the number of projects has increased, but also the average collection: each project has in fact collected an average of $2 million (€1.7 million), while in 2020 the average collection had been just below $1.6 million (€1.4 million).
In addition, the behavior of investors is also evolving and they are evidently increasingly familiar with the tool. In fact, in addition to an increase in the average number of people investing in each project (309 vs. 292), the average amount each invests in each project has also grown $9.500 vs. $7.300 (€8.200 vs. €6.300).
The offer is also transforming, becoming more and more attractive: if the rates of return, in terms of Roi/year, are more or less constant (12.1% this year 12.3% in 2020), the average expected duration of projects is reducing (22.6 months in 2021 and 26.6 months in 2020).
However, market concentration is still high. There were 5 platforms that successfully closed at least one deal in the first 9 months of this year, equal to 2020, but more than 90% of the collection is concentrated in the top two: Walliance which raised $19.2 million (€16.5 million) and Concrete Investing which raised $9.8 million (€8.5 million).
Real Estate Lending Crowdfunding
Real Estate Lending Crowdfunding, as we have seen, is experiencing even more tumultuous growth, also evidenced by the number of projects. In the first three quarters of 2021, 172 real estate projects were financed compared to 111 in the same period of 2020, and this is the main “driver” of the growth in disbursement, given that the average collection has increased, but not so significantly ($263,700 (€227,000) per project in 2021 vs. $249,000 (€214,000) in 2020).
There are fewer investors on average, but they invest more. In fact, the average number of lenders per campaign has decreased quite substantially (148 in 2021 vs. 232 in 2020), but the average investment has increased to $2.900 (€2.500) in 2021 from $1.700 (€1.500) in 2020.
The yields offered in 2021 are almost the same as the previous year (9.8% vs. 9.7% Roi/year) and so is the average duration of transactions (11.8 months vs. 11.5), although significantly lower than in equity.
Compared to equity, the real estate lending market is in a largely expansive phase, starting with the number of platforms. In these first 9 months, the market has seen the entry of as many as 9 new operators, in addition to the 6 that were already operating in 2020. The only exception, of an opposite sign, is the Estonian platform CrowdEstate, which in 2021 stopped operating in Italy, at least in terms of real estate projects. And this translates into greater dilution, although not very marked, given that the first 4 platforms in 2020 represented 91% of the collection, while in 2021 they represented 88%.
However, the composition of the top 4 platforms has changed. In 2021, the aforementioned CrowdEstate, which had raised $4.4 million (€3.8 million, was replaced by Recrowd which, launched in 2020, had raised $447,000 (€385,000) in September 2020, while in the same period of 2021 it had already raised over $8 million (€7 million).
In addition to Recrowd, among the 4 largest platforms are confirmed Ethical Yield ( $18.5 million (€15.9 million) in 2021 vs $12.2 million (€10.5 million) in 2020), Trusters ( $9.8 million (€8.4 million) vs $5.6 million (€4.8 million)), and Re-Lender ($3.5 million (€3 million) vs $2.7 million (€2.3million) ). In addition to these, two other platforms have raised more than $1.16 million (€1 million) in these first 9 months: Bridge Asset, which last year, in its first year had raised $813,000 (€700,000), and Housers.
__
(Featured Image by Pepi Stojanovski via Unsplash)
DISCLAIMER: This article was written by a third party contributor and does not reflect the opinion of Born2Invest, its management, staff or its associates. Please review our disclaimer for more information.
This article may include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believe,” “project,” “estimate,” “become,” “plan,” “will,” and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks as well as uncertainties, including those discussed in the following cautionary statements and elsewhere in this article and on this site. Although the Company may believe that its expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, the actual results that the Company may achieve may differ materially from any forward-looking statements, which reflect the opinions of the management of the Company only as of the date hereof. Additionally, please make sure to read these important disclosures.
First published in Crowdfunding buzz, a third-party contributor translated and adapted the article from the original. In case of discrepancy, the original will prevail.
Although we made reasonable efforts to provide accurate translations, some parts may be incorrect. Born2Invest assumes no responsibility for errors, omissions or ambiguities in the translations provided on this website. Any person or entity relying on translated content does so at their own risk. Born2Invest is not responsible for losses caused by such reliance on the accuracy or reliability of translated information. If you wish to report an error or inaccuracy in the translation, we encourage you to contact us.
-
Crypto1 week ago
XRP Hits Annual High: ETFs on the Horizon as Ripple Stays Optimistic
-
Crowdfunding21 hours ago
Alternative Finance Still at a Standstill, According to the Latest Research by the School of Management of Polimi
-
Biotech2 weeks ago
Rovi Cuts Its Profit by 4% in the First Nine Months, to 113.5 Million
-
Biotech5 days ago
Better Care Advances Healthcare Technology with Partnership with Oracle