TopRanked.io Weekly Affiliate Digest: What’s Hot in Affiliate Marketing [uMobix Affiliates]

Quick Disclosure: We’re about to tell you how uMobix affiliates is pretty great. And we really mean it. Just know that if you click on a uMobix affiliates link, we may earn a small commission. Your choice.

When kids first get their hands on a mobile phone, things start out kinda cute.

But then, as they get older, things start to take a darker turn.

Before it finally ends someplace no parent wants to see their kid go.

So lets help those parents keep their kids on the straight and narrow while making a (very) pretty penny to boot.

Topranked.io Affiliate Program of the Week — uMobix Affiliates Review

If you like the idea of helping parents to keep their kids straight while making more than a few bucks for yourself, then I’ve got something you might like.

A lot.

It’s uMobix Affiliates.

Let’s take a closer look.

uMobix Affiliates — The Product

Obviously, if you’re gonna join uMobix affiliates, you’re probably gonna wanna know what you’re going to be selling.

And because I wanna get to the good part quick (the uMobix Affiliates commissions), I’m gonna keep the uMobix affiliates product description short.

So here goes — it’s a mobile tracker.

You know, like full insight into everything that phone (or more precisely, its user) gets up to.

For example, if you join uMobix affiliates, you can help parents track every call, message (whether that be SMS, WhatsApp, Facebook, or any other messaging app), and photo or video on their kids device.

With uMobix affiliates, you can also help parents get a real-time location at any time, day or night.

And uMobix affiliates will even help you help parents to log keystrokes (sexts, passwords, you name it).

In short, with uMobix affiliates, you can help parents get a handle on basically every aspect of their children’s lives.

Sweet right? Now how about them uMobix affiliates commissions?

uMobix Affiliates — The Commissions

While uMobix affiliates might be really good at spying on kids, they’re really bad at promoting their program.

If you go take a look at the uMobix affiliates website, you’ll see something like this.

That means nothing, right?

Right. I mean, what are those percentages uMobix displays with zero context?

And what if you’re selling a $2 product with uMobix affiliates? Then those uMobix affiliates commissions are basically as good as nothing.

Lucky for you, I’ve already deciphered the uMobix affiliates commissions plans. And I even looked at the prices of the products you’ll be promoting with uMobix affiliates.

Let’s start with those percentages.

In each tier, the bigger number refers to the commissions uMobix affiliates will pay you for a first-time purchase. The smaller is how much uMobix affiliates will pay you for rebills.

So basically, big number = first payment; small number = lifetime commissions.

Got it?

Good. Now for the product pricing behind uMobix affiliates — $149.88 for a yearly subscription, $89.97 for a 3-month plan, and $49.99 for a monthly subscription.

I’ll let you do the math on just how good uMobix affiliates commissions really are.

uMobix Affiliates — Next Steps

As always, if you’re not convinced by uMobix affiliates yet, the best thing you can do is head over to TopRanked.io for our full uMobix affiliates review.

Or, if you’re more of a go get ‘em type and ready to start now, head here to join uMobix affiliates now.

Affiliate News Takeaways

The Rise of Reddit

Remember a while back (in our Mate Affiliates review edition) how Reddit was the new black in SEO?

And then a few months ago we told you you’d missed the bus on that trick? (That was in our Changelly Affiliate Program review edition.)

No?

Here’s the short version:

• Google SERPs got bad.
• People started appending Reddit to searches en masse.
• This opened up a nice opportunity to do some organic SEO by spamming Reddit.
• Then everyone caught on, Reddit got overrun by AI spam, and the easy hack became just another ultra-competitive channel.

Anyway, now you know the story, guess where we are three months later?

Yep, Google caught wind of it all, and decided it was time to organically boost Reddit in its SERPs.

And no, I’m not talking about that little dumpster fire we all know as SGE. (See our PureVPN affiliate program review for more on that.)

Apparently, SGE’s becoming increasingly irrelevant — it’s already declined to just 7% of queries and dropping. And as for the 7% of AI overviews remaining, Reddit has more or less disappeared from the sources.

Instead, what I’m actually talking about when I say Google’s boosting Reddit in its SERPs is the good old “back in the old days” SERPs we all know and love.

You know — classic SEO.

And that’s thrown a bunch of SEOs into a hissy fit. Apparently, they don’t understand why anonymous UGC is suddenly outranking their authoritative, carefully crafted E-E-A-T content.

Anyway, now you know this, why should you care?

Isn’t SEO meant to be dead?

Well, no.

We first said this back in our LongtailPro affiliate program review edition. And we’ve repeated it a bunch of times. Like in our LiveChat Affiliates review and Plus500 affiliates review editions.

But now that AI’s had a little time to marinate, you no longer have to take our word for it.

Basically, no surprises here, AI was just a little bit overhyped from the moment ChatGPT first dropped.

Now, I could point to a bunch of sources here. Like this report from The Information about Google, Amazon, and co. quietly trying to tamp down AI expectations. Or this damning report that Goldman Sachs just dropped, which sums it up as “too much spend, too little benefit.”

But maybe most damning is that OpenAI has already sorta admitted that all those “what did Ilya see” memes might be for nothing.

Essentially, Mira Murati did what she does best. That is, she was a little too frank, spilling the beans on all the secret AGI goodness that OpenAI’s hiding behind the scenes.

Mira Murati says the AI models that OpenAI have in their labs are not much more advanced than those which are publicly available pic.twitter.com/OtgXhZg13P

— Tsarathustra (@tsarnick) June 12, 2024

So basically, we can conclude one thing at this point — some exponential leap in AI’s not about to happen anytime soon.

And no amount of proompting’s gonna change that.

And that means the way things are right now is probably a pretty good indication of where they’re gonna be for at least a couple of years.

So where are things now?

Well, Bing never took over search. And if Google majorly scaling back its AI overviews is any indicator, its SGE isn’t about to either.

And as for ChatGPT — the killer chatbot that people are apparently using instead of Google — it currently ranks #27 in the US. Well behind Google, Wikipedia, the New York Times, CNN, ESPN, and even friggen XVideos (#12), PornHub (#13), and XNXX (#18).

And since we all know people are really only using ChatGPT to make logos, cheat on homework, and… well, that’s about it… it’s a long shot to claim it’s becoming a search replacement any time soon. (See our Travelpayouts affiliate program review edition for some interesting use case stats.)

Takeaway

Long story short — Reddit’s now more important than ever for SEO.

And good ol’ traditional SERPs aren’t going away anytime soon, despite what Altman and co. might have led you on to believe.

So go read some of our previous Reddit coverage (linked earlier) to get some neat Reddit spam techniques, then go find something to sell.

And hey, speaking of what to sell, here’s a fun fact.

Can you guess what one of the top 100 subreddits is that just so happens to be an ultra-monetizable niche?

Yep, r/Parenting.

And, given what #12, #13, and #18 on the most popular websites list are (they’re all pr0n), you just know there’s a bunch of parents worried about what their kids are getting up to on their mobiles.

That’s an anxiety you could easily offer a solution to if you’d just joined Umobix affiliates when we told you to.

Facebook’s Cooked

If you’ve been on Facebook as a regular user for a while, you’re not alone if you feel things have degraded somewhat.

These days, everywhere you look, people are saying the same thing.

“Too many ads.”

“Too much spam.”

“Too many scams.”

“Fake accounts are rampant.”

“Too much engagement farming.”

“I no longer see the stuff I want to see.”

Etc.

Etc.

And based on that alone, you’d be perfectly reasonable for thinking people would use Facebook a whole lot less.

But, of course, that’s just anecdotal evidence.

If you ask Zuck — the man with the numbers — he’ll tell you everything’s fine.

And hey, look at that. According to Meta’s earnings reports, it is fine.

I mean, there’s plenty of user growth.

Specifically, the number of “Family daily active people” (DAP) grew to the tune of about 7% year-over-year, according to the last quarterly report.

And, at the same time, the total number of ad impressions shot up by 20% as ad prices rose by 6%, netting Meta a nice little 27% YoY revenue boost.

Sounds like a healthy platform with strong growth, doesn’t it?

Of course it does…

…until you scratch the surface and look beyond its self-congratulatory investor relations fluff.

I mean, let’s start with the obvious thing that should jump out here.

Growing ad impressions 13% faster than user growth (+20% vs +7%) must have cost Meta something in the user sentiment department. Especially given it was already a pretty ad-heavy corner of the internet to begin with.

Dito for upping ad prices by 6% at the same time it diluted the value of each ad by jacking up ad impressions per user. That must’ve cost something in the advertiser satisfaction department, too.

In any case, that’s just speculation. After all, maybe Meta didn’t grow ad revenues by 27% in a year when digital ad spending only increased by about 9% across the board by abusing its advertisers.

And maybe it managed to defy basic math and didn’t jack up ad impressions per user to deliver that 20% increase in impressions while “DAPs” only grew by 7%.

Maybe it was just smart business.

Or maybe, just maybe, it’s the classic third act of the canonical enshittification story playing out exactly as it was scripted:

“Here is how platforms die: first, they are good to their users; then they abuse their users to make things better for their business customers; finally, they abuse those business customers to claw back all the value for themselves. Then, they die.” — Cory Doctorow, Wired.

(See our Alpha Affiliates review edition for a full definition of enshittification if you want to know more about this.)

The only way we’ll know is if we take a closer look.

So let’s start by considering that wonderfully nebulous, easily-manipulatable number it calls “Family daily active people” (DAP).

That’s the new stand-in since Meta ditched the good old DAU metric we all know and love.

The difference between the two is that DAPs are the number of users across all of Meta’s products, and DAUs used to be reported by product.

Why would Meta make that switch?

The generous explanation is that it makes its investor reports easier to read.

Or, the more obvious explanation is that it’s just some ploy to obscure the fact that actual user growth is ancient history.

But that’s just speculation.

And besides, we still haven’t managed to explain how Meta grew its ad revenue (+27%) and impressions (+20%) faster than both global ad spend (+9%) and claimed user growth (+7%) for the same period.

Could it have something to do with the rise in outright scammy advertising?

Anecdotally, this has been happening for a little while now — Facebook’s been getting more lax and letting increasingly dodgy ads run rampant.

Naturally, Meta likes to blame this on the issue of scale. The most recent time it did this was on its Japanese blog a couple of months ago. There, it claimed, “Meta reviews ads against our ad standards… but reviewing a huge number of ads around the world presents challenges.”

Of course, its revenue growth (and thus its financial capacity to support the teams/technology needed to review more ads) is a fun counterpoint to this supposed “challenge”. But, hey, at least they’re “trying”.

Or are they?

To quote one FTC report talking about the origination of shopping scams, “Facebook was identified… in 60% of these reports.”

And it’s not just the FTC, shopping scams, or even the US for that matter. We see similar numbers for pretty much any scam, no matter where we look.

To give another example from earlier this year, Revolut reported that 60% of all scams reported by its customers in the UK originated from Facebook. And that number ticked up slightly, to 61%, when it reported figures for the entire EEA.

Now, sure, I get that Facebook is huge. So of course it’s gonna be the originator for a big swathe of scams and stuff.

But is it really that huge that it commands 60% of all online attention?

Are we really to believe that Meta’s other platforms, plus TikTok, YouTube, X, etc. are being left in Facebook’s dust to duke it out for the remaining 40%?

Somehow, I doubt it.

More likely, the real explanation is Meta’s just so desperate to “make number go up” in the face of a dying product that it’s letting its standards slip so low that it sees nothing wrong with, gee, I don’t know… “Paddle Boards Retail” selling guitars from a domain that looks like it has more to do with denim than anything else.

Now, obviously, we can’t know for sure.

But, at the very least, there is one thing we know for sure.

If you ask literally anyone other than Meta, Facebook is actually dying.

Take the endless stream of articles cropping up. Like this declaring it a zombie platform, “where a mix of bots, humans, and accounts that were once humans but aren’t anymore mix together to form a disastrous website where there is little social connection at all.”

And yet, even with this very visible increase in bot… err, I mean, “Family daily active people”… activity, its traffic is still tanking.

For instance, take this data from Similarweb.

If its numbers are halfway accurate, Facebook’s traffic has declined by about 7% in the last year.

And if you thought that sounds like nothing more than a small speed bump, that data set also contains three more years’ worth of data, too.

In total, in the last four years, Facebook traffic is down 43.6%.

Or, to put a number on that, it’s currently getting 15.6B hits a month vs 27.7B in 2020.

If that doesn’t smell like a dying platform, then I don’t know what does.

Takeaway

Alright, so here’s the good news.

Obviously, with 3.24B “Family daily active people” still in Meta’s walled garden, it’s not like Facebook is actually dead.

But, with that said, it is, objectively, bleeding users and traffic.

That’s making Facebook increasingly desperate to do whatever it takes to “make number go up”. And right now, that would be letting its platform get overrun with increasingly blatant scams/spam/slop/etc.

That means, if you’ve ever wanted to try some method that was a little outside of the ol’ “trust and safety” guidelines but were afraid it might be too hard to slip by the all-seeing eye of Facebook, maybe today’s your lucky day. (Just don’t go counting on it as a place to grow a long-term, sustainable audience if that’s the sort of play you were hoping to make.)

Now, as for what you should try and sell while spamming Facebook into the ground, there’s maybe one more stat you need that I left out — Facebook’s biggest user group.

As it turns out, that would be millennials, despite the boomer rumors that seem to persist.

Apparently, “25.7% of people between the ages of 25-34 use Facebook, while 18.1% of people between the ages of 35-44 use Facebook.”

And if you know what I’m thinking, that just so happens to be prime parenting age.

So here’s one ploy you can try.

Start with the Facebook AI slop bingo as a template. It’s become a cliche because it works.

AI Slop Bingo!

Made by @Vreiia1 https://t.co/VkG7UolHD6 pic.twitter.com/JCoRDxTnO6

— Mark Kretschmann (@mark_k) June 23, 2024

Hopefully, you should end up with a post like this.

Now, as you probably know, you’re gonna need a little help from some “Familiy daily active people” to juice the algorithm and get this in front of people’s eyes. Fortunately, for that, we’ve got a solution — check out our Media Mister affiliate program review edition. (Hint: the solution is the affiliate program of the week.)

Now you’ve got some traction, don’t stop there.

Use this as a gateway to funnel people into something about protecting their children… you know, with something like what you’ll be selling with Umobix affiliates.

Closing Thought

Usually, we like to finish things off with some sort of positive closing thought.

But this week, I thought we’d shake things up with something completely negative.

So let’s kick things off with what is, perhaps, the stupidest inspirational quote I’ve ever seen.

Now, hopefully I don’t have to explain why this is so stupid.

But just in case, here’s a quick, top-of-the-mind list of stuff this sort of behavior leads to:

1. Dependence on external validation
2. Limited self-reliance
3. False sense of accomplishment
4. Inhibited personal growth

Does any of that stuff sound good?

Didn’t think so.

And just in case you’re not convinced yet, let me ask you this — Do you really think anyone who never goes against anything you say or do is always telling the truth? (99% chance the answer is no.)

So what do you do instead?

That’s right — you seek out critics.

Worst case scenario, you hear a bunch of stuff you’ve already thought of and countered. But more likely, you’ll get challenged in ways that will make you grow.

Oh, and speaking of growing — do you know who else needs a critic or two in their life?

Yep, it’s that kid with a rampant pr0n addiction he’s hiding from Mom and Pop.

Help Mom and Pop help him — join Umobix affiliates today.

__

(Featured image by SevenStorm JUHASZIMRUS via Pexels)

DISCLAIMER: This article was written by a third party contributor and does not reflect the opinion of Born2Invest, its management, staff or its associates. Please review our disclaimer for more information.

This article may include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believe,” “project,” “estimate,” “become,” “plan,” “will,” and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks as well as uncertainties, including those discussed in the following cautionary statements and elsewhere in this article and on this site. Although the Company may believe that its expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, the actual results that the Company may achieve may differ materially from any forward-looking statements, which reflect the opinions of the management of the Company only as of the date hereof. Additionally, please make sure to read these important disclosures.