“Fake news” is a bogus journalistic piece, crafted to look as it had been written and published by reputable news agencies, but are filled with misinformation and erroneous data. Conspiracy theories, which have been around for much longer (at least by centuries), are the latest wild speculative ideas that challenge proven facts or research studies with their own imaginative take on the subject.
Both have found a nesting place on the internet, particularly through social media. Previously automatically dismissed by readers and the greater public, they have been gaining ground and “credibility” among the millions of users who then spread the falsehood around. As they go viral, and simply because they are cited and posted frequently on the net, their theories and falsified data are being accepted by many as gospel truth.
Forbes says that conspiracy theories are getting their nth wind on the net because of the diligence of their proponents. These theories range from the flat-earth teachings, the fake Apollo moon landings, to the recent ones that the Orlando shootings were caused by right-wing or left-wing groups. A few compelling tweets or posts on social media, accompanied by stirring photos, is enough for the conspiracy theory to go viral.
The same principle holds true for fake news, says Live Science. However, fake news is shared more often because, unlike conspiracy theorists, it presents itself as an information being reported by credible journalists. Other culprits that make fake news go viral are people’s limited attention span and an overload of information which sometimes prevents them from discerning which reports are true and which are not.
Both fake news and conspiracy theories have also acquired a more lethal form on the net, warns the International Journalists’ Network. They can be used to discredit an enemy, ruin a reputation, or bring down a cause. A journalist’s once solid reputation can be ruined with a smear campaign masquerading as false news, and then pushing it to go viral. The price: $55,000. For a bit of industrial sabotage, a barrage of dislikes can make your rival’s YouTube video look unpopular. The price: a manageable $1.7 for every 100 dislikes.
Audax, a Low-Risk ESG Company According to Morningstar Sustainalytics ESG Rating
In summary, Audax has demonstrated its leadership in sustainability and ESG performance by earning an "ESG Low-Risk Company" rating from...
VR Bank Bamberg-Forchheim Celebrates Seven Successful Crowdfunding Projects
The VR Bank Bamberg-Forchheim eG not only initiates and maintains the online platform, but also acts as a donor. Because...
Alarming Campaign Absenteeism Jeopardizes Bill Regulating Recreational Cannabis in Colombia
The bill regulating recreational cannabis must pass a total of eight debates, divided into first and second rounds: four and...
CNBV Calls for Unity in the Mexican Fintech Sector to Drive its Development
The fintech sector is made up of 650 identified firms, according to the latest Fintech Radar Mexico 2023 published by...
Jazz Pharmaceuticals’ Leukemia Drug Receives European Commission Approval
Jazz Pharmaceuticals is a biopharmaceutical company dedicated to the development of drugs in neuroscience and oncology. Founded in 2003 in...
Business2 weeks ago
The TopRanked.io Weekly Digest: What’s Hot in Affiliate Marketing [CamSoda Affiliates Review]
Africa2 days ago
RADEEF: a 182 Million Dirham Plan to Combat Flooding in Morocco
Crowdfunding1 week ago
Mamacrowd Launches Five Campaigns with November 10th Deadline
Crypto7 days ago
Stanford University Returns Millions from FTX