Connect with us


Trump’s trade war negatively affects the red states more than the blue

The red states are far more exposed to the negative impacts of Trump’s trade wars.



There’s ideology. And then there’s reality and outcomes. Unfortunately, the trade war overtures in the name of fairer competition, disfavors jobs in the red states far more than in the blue ones.

Last time, I looked at how curbing immigration is likely to be a major factor tipping us into the next recession. That recession will turn into a depression, given the extreme bubble economy created by QE policies, and now tax cuts.

Trump quickly learned in 2016 that the top Republican voters’ “hot buttons” were immigration and unfair foreign trade agreements. These were the far right’s concerns. But his trade policies will hurt the red states more, as the chart below demonstrates.

The far left campaign of Bernie Sander’s was more about the 1 percent taking all the gains, and the corruption of Wall Street. As it turned out, everyday voters cared more about those hot-button topics than the rich getting richer.

And more of the everyday blue-collar democratic voters leaned towards the right on Trump’s issues. That’s how key swing states in the Midwest were won, earning the electoral college despite losing the total vote.

The red states have exports of $2.1 million versus blue states at $1.7 million. That’s 24 percent higher for red state exports.

But the numbers get worse. When you look at exposed jobs in red states at 3.9 million versus 2.5 million in the blues states, things don’t look so good.

The red states have 56 percent more exposed jobs than blue states. The chart below shows the states that have a higher median exposure of 9.8 percent of GDP to the tariff retaliation expected.

© Harry Dent

Texas, the largest, is at 16 percent.

There are only four out of 20 for the blue states, with Oregon the highest at 18 percent. And the largest, California, near the median at only 10 percent.

Also, notice how there are 30 red states against 20 blue. The red is generally more rural, while the blue more urban, which means less territory, but higher density (and hence more liberal).

It was the rural-leaning states that gave Trump the edge in winning the white swing voters there at more like 80 percent. And it also favored him in the electoral college, which favors space over density.

Red states, being more numerous and affected, had a specially large impact on the Senate. Each state gets two, regardless of population (unlike the House).

The red states with the highest exposure to GDP, in order, are Indiana, Louisiana, Texas, North Carolina, Iowa, Kentucky, Oklahoma and Michigan.

The blue states are Oregon, Minnesota, California, and New Mexico.

So, we’ll see how those swing voters feel when they start losing their jobs. And a recession—an eventual depression by my forecasts—will clearly hurt the incumbent president and his party. This will very likely happen by early 2020, just ahead of the next major election.

I always stated that whoever won in 2016 would not be re-elected in 2020!

When the 1929 crash and Great Depression set in, a businessman (Hoover) had been elected in 1928 as a Republican.

And who won big in 1932? Well, you should know the outcome of that by now.

DISCLAIMER: This article expresses my own ideas and opinions. Any information I have shared are from sources that I believe to be reliable and accurate. I did not receive any financial compensation for writing this post, nor do I own any shares in any company I’ve mentioned. I encourage any reader to do their own diligent research first before making any investment decisions.

Harry S. Dent Jr. studied economics in college in the 1970s, receiving his MBA from Harvard Business School, where he was a Baker Scholar and was elected to the Century Club for leadership excellence. Harry grew to find the study of economics vague and inconclusive and became so disillusioned by the state of his chosen profession that he turned his back on it. Instead, he threw himself into the burgeoning new science of finance which married economic research and market research. Identifying and studying demographic trends, business cycles, consumers’ purchasing power and many other trends empowered Harry to forecast economic and market changes. Over the last three decades, he’s spoken to executives, financial advisors and investors around the world. He’s appeared on “Good Morning America,” PBS, CNBC and CNN/FN. He’s been featured in Barron’s, Investor’s Business Daily, Entrepreneur, Fortune, Success, U.S. News and World Report, Business Week, The Wall Street Journal, American Demographics and Omni. He is a regular guest on Fox Business’s “America’s Nightly Scorecard.” Harry has also written numerous best-selling books over the years, such as The Great Boom Ahead, The Roaring 2000s, the Roaring 2000s Investors and The Demographic Cliff. In his most recent book The Sale of a Lifetime: How the Great Bubble Burst of 2017 Can Make You Rich (2016), Harry looks at the upcoming economic crisis and reveals how it could be the single greatest chance to build wealth we’ll ever see and how we can capitalize on such a unique and historical opportunity. He explains how many of the richest Americans in history have used this same kind of opportunity to quickly accumulate incredible amounts of money, in a short period of time.