New York Times columnist Paul B. Brown makes a solid case for why he and his wife are giving their grown children their inheritance money while they are still alive, instead of waiting to have a will disclose it after they have passed.
Brown’s reasons are supported by an article on Fox Business that advises these senior parents to discuss inheritance with their children as soon as possible. Ultimately, however, both articles reinforce that the greatest legacy that middle-class folks can give to their offspring is excellent fiscal management. In short, do not just give those monies, but impart with them the wisdom in recognizing its value and growing it.
The author and his wife do live by those values and have raised their children to do the same. Brown is a wealth expert who appears to belong in the upper-middle-class bracket. However, he and his wife are still self-employed and actively working. Both also live well below their means, although they are very familiar with the kind of luxury that huge amounts can buy, because of their interaction with their affluent clients.
With his wife’s blessing, Brown decided to give their four grown children parts of their inheritance over the next few years. The money is given through the form of a check along with other Christmas gifts annually. The Browns say that even the accumulated amount is not exorbitant but is equivalent to tuition paid for the first three years of college.
The first reason for giving the inheritance at present is that the Browns’ adult children do need the money now, and having it can go a long way in establishing a solid future for them. Those needs entail bank payment for a home mortgage, investment in mutual funds, or higher education. The Brown children will be using the money as an investment for their respective tomorrows.
Second, it would be smarter to give the inheritance money ASAP because their value would still be significant. As mentioned above, they would still be substantial enough to pay for the balance of a new home or as seed money for a future business. Should the children receive the same amount in about five years’ time, then they would have depreciated significantly. They would no longer be enough to finance those aforementioned homes and enterprises.
Third, the Browns are dispensing with the inheritance because they know that they have trained their children to be fiscally responsible. They have taught their kids what the Fox Business article advises: learn how money works, come up with a strategy for funding and investing, and make sure the value of every count is grown to finance your dreams in the future. That high level of financial IQ can help the kids make their money work for them, and not squander them away. And that is why it would be more relevant to give their inheritance now rather than in the not-so-distant future.
How Fintech is taking France by storm
There are a number of gaps in the financial sector that allow space for growth. These problems are slowly but...
How sustainability is redefining the way we invest
Sustainability is now a key metric for investors. People want to make a positive impact with their money whilst also...
Why companies need to embrace modern storage solutions
To stay up to date organizations need to overhaul their legacy storage solutions. Although they may not need to move...
German couple spearhead aid project in Southern Africa
A couple from Germany first travelled to Mozambique in 2010. Since then they have visited South Africa a few times...
The state of EU regulations for CBD food and oil
For the past few years the CBD market in Europe has been largely overlooked. Recently, things have changed. European legislators...
- Cannabis6 days ago
Israel bets on the medical cannabis sector
- Featured6 days ago
The CBD sector continues to outperform the general cannabis industry
- Featured4 days ago
The Singapore fintech festival puts 5 startup leaders in the spotlight
- Featured6 days ago
How Tencent has defined the Chinese fintech space