Trading of milk futures began in 1996 with the trading of the Basic Formula Price (BFP) contract which was a deliverable contract. It was difficult to offset a contract due to a very thin trading activity and the fact that the market makers knew that a hedger needed to get out of a contract rather than deliver it to a determined location.
This would be very difficult due to many farms having their milk picked up at the farm rather than owning their own trucks and hauling it to a milk plant for processing. So, those who hedged in the market needed to offset those hedges prior to the settling of the contract. Many times this resulted in substantial losses as those buying back those contracts had to take whatever was offered in a thinly traded market giving up substantial amounts of money.
If milk futures contracts would have continued that way for a few years, they would likely have ceased trading as farmers would not have used it as a tool to protect prices. Fortunately, it was changed into a cash-settled contract which increased the attractiveness of using the market to protect milk prices. However, it was difficult to guess what the final announced BFP price was to be. The final calculations were completed based on various reporting points that could swing prices significantly from the final trading of the futures contract for that month. It was common to see a substantial difference in announced price from where the trade anticipated it to be.
Fortunately, milk pricing was again changed to reflected class pricing based on weekly reporting by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) and later the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS). This greatly improved the ability of traders to predict monthly final announced class milk prices which improved trading interest and activity. In the Federal Order system of pricing, there are four classes of milk. Class I milk is that which is used for bottling. Class II milk is that which is used for what is called softs, such as yogurt, cottage cheese, ice cream, dips, spreads, etc. Class III is cheese. Class IV is butter and milk powders. There are futures contracts only on Class III and Class IV milk with Class III by far the most active contract. Pricing of monthly milk prices based on weekly AMS prices has become very accurate with the last trading day of a contract only being within a few cents of the actual announced prices. This makes these contracts very good contracts to trade with virtually no surprises from the end of the contract to the actual price that is announced the following day.
Dairy contracts are also the truest contracts to trade. There is no basis (difference between cash and futures) involved like there is in a grain contract. This is due to the futures being based on the actual base price of the contract with no variation from Federal Order to Federal Order. However, there are some states such as California and Idaho that are not part of the Federal Order system and have a different pricing mechanism which makes hedging a bit more challenging. However, traders just trading dairy futures as an attempt to make a profit have no concern over these differences.
Dairy futures and options are a great market to trade providing many opportunities for those who would like to diversify their portfolio. It is a true market, but it is certainly not without volatility as traders anticipate the movement of cheese and butter prices on a daily basis. If you want to take a closer look at adding dairy to your portfolio, contact a broker who is knowledgeable in the dairy industry and can help you broaden your horizons.
Most consumers have no idea what goes into the pricing of milk at the farm level and nor should they need to know. The important aspect is that consumers have a choice of a variety of high-quality dairy products when shopping. That is what makes dairy farming a great industry and one that is very rewarding.
DISCLAIMER: This article expresses my own ideas and opinions. Any information I have shared are from sources that I believe to be reliable and accurate. I did not receive any financial compensation in writing this post, nor do I own any shares in any company I’ve mentioned. I encourage any reader to do their own diligent research first before making any investment decisions.
How these three technology companies are defining the post-COVID world
Covid-19 has upended our lives in dozens of ways, and as the US continues to struggle with rising case numbers,...
Hope in Morocco: after 4 months of confinement the economy is in recession but the government finally announces a recovery plan
Moroccans are suffering harshly from the social consequences of four months of health crisis. The tourism sector in particular, and...
Record gold prices continue apace and silver hits its price target
Gold prices continue to soar and silver is slowly beginning to break out of a multi-year channel. Precious metals bulls...
Possible Ka-Booms as Far as the Eyes Can See
Explosive growth in Silver and Gold are but one of many indicators of an overbought market, with large banks and...
How the Ministry of Agriculture is trying to help farmers in Burkina Faso
Burkina Faso is one of the African countries affected by insufficient rainfalls. Due to the global situation and the lockdown...
Featured5 days ago
Deutsche Bank joins the fintech company Traxpay
Featured6 days ago
Why sustainable investment is the path to corporate resilience
Cannabis5 days ago
Demecan launches an online cannabis shop for pharmacies
Biotech6 days ago
The Government of Catalonia awards Roche a €9.2 million contract for analysis services