In San Francisco, a household now needs an income of $188,000 to afford rent for the average two-bedroom house or apartment with 30 percent of the household income spent on housing.
The problem is that the median income is only $103,801. Housing is 81 percent out of reach! And this is true across the country as well.
It takes an hourly wage of $22.10 to afford the median two-bedroom apartment versus the actual median wage of $16.88. That makes it 31 percent out of reach. And the median cost for a two-bedroom apartment three-times minimum wage.
The most expensive state is Hawaii at $36.16 compared to the $16.16 actual hourly wage earned, making it 123 percent out of reach.
Meanwhile, the lowest is Arkansas at $13.84 needed and an actual hourly wage earned of $13.05. That is only 6 percent out of reach.
Then there’s Puerto Rico at only $9.24 an hour to afford that median two-bedroom versus $9.76 of actual wages. Finally, an affordable place to live as a U.S. citizen.
The next two tables summarize a recent survey that ranked cities by the percentage of households that are cost-burdened by renting or owning houses. This means that they spend over 30 percent of their income on housing. They also have some good information on incomes and housing affordability.
The top five for cost burdens are San Francisco (55.9 percent), San Jose (54.7 percent), Oxnard/Thousand Oaks/Ventura (53.5 percent), San Diego (52.2 percent), and Honolulu (51.9 percent). Four of these are in California—no surprise. And Hawaii has always been expensive.
The lowest out of these are Stockton (30.2 percent), Austin (30.7 percent), Baltimore (33.7 percent), Portland (33.9 percent), New Haven (34.2 percent), and Denver (34.8 percent). It jumps to 39 percent-plus from there.
Austin and Denver are rated high for attractiveness as well.
Housing for ownership is least affordable in San Jose at 10.9-times median income. Los Angeles comes in at 9.6, with San Francisco at 9.4, and San Diego at 8.1.
Honolulu is not quoted here on home prices, but other surveys put its price-to-income ratio at near 10 times, similar to San Francisco.
Conversely, the lowest homeownership rate is in Los Angeles at 47.4 percent, with both high prices and lower incomes. Only Miami has lower. Both of these high-cost rental cities have the lethal combination of expensive housing costs and modest median incomes.
New York is at 51.0 percent, with San Diego (52.1 percent), San Francisco (53.0 percent), and Honolulu (54.1 percent) all in the same range.
The most affordable price-to-income ratios for home ownership are in New Haven, Connecticut, at a fair 3 times as much, Baltimore at 3.4, and surprisingly, Bridgeport/Stamford at 3.6 times.
It’s us—the older Baby Boomers—that will feel the brunt of things if we don’t get out of the way.
DISCLAIMER: This article expresses my own ideas and opinions. Any information I have shared are from sources that I believe to be reliable and accurate. I did not receive any financial compensation for writing this post, nor do I own any shares in any company I’ve mentioned. I encourage any reader to do their own diligent research first before making any investment decisions.
Wheat markets move higher amid potential disease problems
Meanwhile, corn exploded higher last week as the weather market got underway.
Why technical analysis works in the foreign exchange market
How useful is technical analysis in forex trading?
Some insurance tips travelers need to know
Accident or travel insurance policies help protect your finances while you're on the road.
The status of today’s economic inflation
The cost of living is getting higher and yet, the government would say there is not much inflation.
A brief history of financial entropy
The global economy began an experiment with fiscal and monetary alchemy when it exited the gold standard almost 50 years...