One of the hardest things I’ve had to stake my name to was the concept of how sunspot cycles ebb and flow about every 10 years and the effect they have on our economy and stock market.
I’ve already got the label of “crackpot,” so giving skeptics more meat to chew on was tough. I did it anyway because I’d done my research (as I always do) and knew that we’ve had major or minor recessions about every 10 years. They occurred in the early 1960s, early-to-mid 1970s, early 1980s, early 1990s, early 2000s, and between 2008/2009. Another is due just ahead, between 2018 and 2020 by my forecasts.
This isn’t coincidence. There’s something behind this: sunspots.
Ned Davis, a great cycles guy, came up with the Decennial Cycle, which forecast that the first few years of every decade would see recessions and minor or major stock crashes.
I followed his cycle for decades, and it worked. That is, until the early 2010s.
That’s when I expected we’d see a large crash, given the massive peak of the Baby Boom spending cycle in late 2007. Yet we only got a minor crash into late 2011. There was a large crash from late 2007 into early 2009, but not on this cycle.
So, I went back to the drawing board. What had gone wrong? What had I missed?
While working on this problem, I came across an article in Barron’s, written by one of the largest fund managers at PIMCO. He was touting the sunspot cycle, saying how it had saved him from the 2000-2002 tech wreck. I dug into this phenomenon, which scientists can track back to the 1600s accurately, and I found that 88% of the recessions back to the mid-1800s (where there is good data) occurred in the downside of these sunspot cycles!
And better, 100%, 11 out of 11 major financial crises, occurred on the downside of this cycle – like the one I’m forecasting just ahead.
In short: Ignore this cycle at your peril.
Sunspot cycles are simple: sun and energy.
The more there is, the better people feel, just like sitting on the beach and soaking it in energizes us. The less sun and energy there is, the more depressed people feel. Just hang out in Seattle during the long rainy season if you want a taste of this.
That’s why, despite other more fundamental cycles, people will be more bullish in a rising sunspot cycle than a declining one. There is literally, on average, 20 percent more radiation (and rainfall from evaporation) at the top of such cycles than at the bottom.
After many months of documenting past correlations, I finally presented this to our best audience at one of our annual Irrational Economic Summits.
The reception was skeptical, to say the least.
Then an emergency room nurse stood up. She and her policeman husband, she said, clearly observe the spike in erratic behavior, crimes, and accidents during the extra light reflected just during a full moon!
That’s when the audience started to take me seriously!
The sunspot cycle can oscillate between eight and 14 years. That makes this one of the more challenging cycles to implement into my hierarchy. It’s not as clockwork as most of the others. But that’s OK because scientists are very good at predicting this cycle!
Here’s an update on the last two sunspot cycles:
The last one peaked in March of 2000, right at the top of the tech bubble! There was a first crash into late 2002 and then the Great Recession from 2008-2009 came at the very bottom of that cycle. And it’s typical to see recessions and stock declines right after the peak, or near the bottom.
The sunspot cycle into the next top, in February 2014 was the most extreme I’ve measured, clocking in at nearly 14 years long.
That’s what threw off Ned Davis’s Decennial Cycle in the early 2010s.
The most recent sunspot cycle didn’t see the normal crash just after the peak thanks to unprecedented central bank QE and stimulus. But you can see that we’re now quickly approaching the low end of this cycle starting in late 2017—the same place where the last Great Recession hit from early 2008 into mid-2009.
Now this cycle is projected, by the best scientists, to bottom around early 2020 or so.
That’s when my Geopolitical Cycle and the worst of the Baby Boomer’s Spending Wave bottoms!
My point here is this: if we’re going to see a major downturn and the bubble burst, it will come between now and early 2020 or so.
That’s when you need to protect your assets.
DISCLAIMER: This article expresses my own ideas and opinions. Any information I have shared are from sources that I believe to be reliable and accurate. I did not receive any financial compensation in writing this post, nor do I own any shares in any company I’ve mentioned. I encourage any reader to do their own diligent research first before making any investment decisions.
Interest for Bitcoin Returns: Demand Outstrips Supply Again
With demand pushing Bitcoin above $27,000, the price closed September above a bullish metric. This is the 20-period simple moving...
How Colombia Is Advancing in the Use of Medical Cannabis
In Latin America, in addition to Colombia, Peru, Argentina, Brazil, and Chile also have other regulations that have given a...
Deagle Launches Crowdfunding for SEM, First Transportable Renewable Energy Production System
To fund its first SEMs, Deagle has launched an equity crowdfunding campaign on Ecomill.it, the first Italian platform to facilitate...
Ideas of Weaker Cotton Demand Due to Economic Problems in Asia Continue
Cotton closed higher last week on ideas of smaller US crops that should be seen in the USDA data that...
ClubDealOnline: Net Income in Q1, Higher Than in the Whole of 2022
For the future, in addition to continuing to support cutting-edge startups on their growth path, the platform ClubDealOnline is increasingly...
Biotech2 weeks ago
AbolerIS Pharma Closes a Round of €27 Million Led by Caixa Capital
Business2 days ago
Using Dow Jones Daily Volatility to Time Entry and Exit Points
Business1 week ago
Current Woes in Bonds Promise Future Grief for Stocks: Focus on Dow Jones
Biotech7 days ago
Jazz Pharmaceuticals’ Leukemia Drug Receives European Commission Approval